Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948271›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

The Progress of Intestinal Epithelial Models from Cell Lines to Gut-On-Chip.

Shafaque Rahman, Mohammed Ghiboub, Joanne M Donkers, Evita van de Steeg, Eric A F van Tol, Theodorus B M Hakvoort, Wouter J de Jonge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Comparison of 2D, 3DBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cytokine-Induced Barrier Dysfunction and Lipid Signaling in a Gut-On-Chip Model.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Gastrointestinal tract, its pathophysiology andWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shafaque RahmanTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2573-1147
Mohammed GhiboubTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2095-371X
Joanne M DonkersThe Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), 3704 HE Zeist, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3280-4703
Evita van de SteegThe Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), 3704 HE Zeist, The Netherlands.
Eric A F van TolThe Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), 3704 HE Zeist, The Netherlands.
Theodorus B M HakvoortTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter J de JongeTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 BK Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3241-1547

Funding

Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, LSH-TKI, Health Holland. MNeon grant LSHM17028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past years, several preclinical in vitro and ex vivo models have been developed that helped to understand some of the critical aspects of intestinal functions in health and disease such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the translation to the human in vivo situation remains problematic. The main reason for this is that these approaches fail to fully reflect the multifactorial and complex in vivo environment (e.g., including microbiota, nutrition, and immune response) in the gut system. Although conventional models such as cell lines, Ussing chamber, and the everted sac are still used, increasingly more sophisticated intestinal models have been developed over the past years including organoids, InTESTine™ and microfluidic gut-on-chip. In this review, we gathered the most recent insights on the setup, advantages, limitations, and future perspectives of most frequently used in vitro and ex vivo models to study intestinal physiology and functions in health and disease.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCell LineGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansIntestinal MucosaIntestinesOrganoidsex vivogut-on-chipinflammationintestinein vitroorganoids

Identifiers

PMID34948271
PMCPMC8709104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.