Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948238›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

A Complex Evaluation of the In-Vivo Biocompatibility and Degradation of an Extruded ZnMgSr Absorbable Alloy Implanted into Rabbit Bones for 360 Days.

Karel Klíma, Dan Ulmann, Martin Bartoš, Michal Španko, Jaroslava Dušková, Radka Vrbová, Jan Pinc, Jiří Kubásek, Marek Vlk, Tereza Ulmannová and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karel KlímaDepartment of Stomatology, General Teaching Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Kateřinská 32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Dan UlmannDepartment of Stomatology, General Teaching Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Kateřinská 32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin BartošDepartment of Stomatology, General Teaching Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Kateřinská 32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Michal ŠpankoDepartment of Stomatology, General Teaching Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Kateřinská 32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jaroslava DuškováDepartment of Pathology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7373-808X
Radka VrbováDepartment of Stomatology, General Teaching Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Kateřinská 32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan PincDepartment of Functional Materials, FZU-The Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Slovance 1999/2, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9581-3204
Jiří KubásekDepartment of Metals and Corrosion Engineering, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Marek VlkDepartment of Stomatology, General Teaching Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Kateřinská 32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Tereza UlmannováDepartment of Stomatology, General Teaching Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Kateřinská 32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
René FoltánDepartment of Stomatology, General Teaching Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Kateřinská 32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Eitan BrizmanDepartment of Stomatology, General Teaching Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Kateřinská 32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Milan DrahošDepartment of Stomatology, General Teaching Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Kateřinská 32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Michal BeňoDepartment of Stomatology, General Teaching Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Kateřinská 32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Vladimír MachoňDepartment of Stomatology, General Teaching Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Kateřinská 32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav ČapekDepartment of Functional Materials, FZU-The Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Slovance 1999/2, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3481-7812
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZUniversity of Chemistry and Technology, Prague · CZ

Funding

Czech Science Foundation 18-06110SMinistry of Education Youth and Sports LM2018110Ministry of Education Youth and Sports SOLID21-CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing incidence of trauma in medicine brings with it new demands on the materials used for the surgical treatment of bone fractures. Titanium, its alloys, and steel are used worldwide in the treatment of skeletal injuries. These metallic materials, although inert, are often removed after the injured bone has healed. The second-stage procedure-the removal of the plates and screws-can overwhelm patients and overload healthcare systems. The development of suitable absorbable metallic materials would help us to overcome these issues. In this experimental study, we analyzed an extruded Zn-0.8Mg-0.2Sr (wt.%) alloy on a rabbit model. From this alloy we developed screws which were implanted into the rabbit tibia. After 120, 240, and 360 days, we tested the toxicity at the site of implantation and also within the vital organs: the liver, kidneys, and brain. The results were compared with a control group, implanted with a Ti-based screw and sacrificed after 360 days. The samples were analyzed using X-ray, micro-CT, and a scanning electron microscope. Chemical analysis revealed only small concentrations of zinc, strontium, and magnesium in the liver, kidneys, and brain. Histologically, the alloy was verified to possess very good biocompatibility after 360 days, without any signs of toxicity at the site of implantation. We did not observe raised levels of Sr, Zn, or Mg in any of the vital organs when compared with the Ti group at 360 days. The material was found to slowly degrade in vivo, forming solid corrosion products on its surface.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsAlloysMaterials TestingTibial FracturesAnimalsHumansMagnesiumRabbitsStrontiumTibiaZincAlloysMagnesiumStrontiumZincabsorbable metalsalloy accumulationbiocompatibilityinternal organsin vivomagnesiumstrontiumsystemic reactionstoxicityzinc

Identifiers

PMID34948238
PMCPMC8706155
OpenAlexW4200098367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.