ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Dental Implants Inserted in Fresh Extraction Sockets versus Healed Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05869292 (Immediate Vs. Early Loading of Immediately Placed Bone Level Tapered Dental Implants), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Immediate Vs. Early Loading of Immediately Placed Bone Level Tapered Dental Implants
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes of zirconia implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Pooled it
- Smoking and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Pooled it
- Impact of Immediate vs Delayed Dental Implants on Survival, Patient Satisfaction, and Quality of Life.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2026Trial
- From Biological Mechanisms to Clinical Outcomes: A Scoping Review Comparing Immediate and Delayed Dental Implant Placement Protocols.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- One-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of immediate versus delayed placement of wide-diameter implants in the mandibular molar region.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of immediate implant placement on buccal bone stability in fresh extraction sockets: A prospective study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Immediate Loading of Implants Placed Immediately in Fresh Sockets: A 10-Year Single-Arm Prospective Case Series Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Immediate implant placement in the premolar maxillary area: a cone-beam computed tomography study.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2025Article
- Assessing the Long-Term Survival of Dental Implants in A Retrospective Analysis: Immediate Versus Delayed Placement.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Dental Implants in Routine Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Multi-Scale Characterization of Conventional and Immediate Dental Implant Systems.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Immediate implant placement in the anterior mandible: a cone beam computed tomography study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Clinical outcomes of 3-5 years follow-up of immediate implant placement in posterior teeth: a prospective study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Local Concentrations of TGF-β1 and IGF-1 Appear Determinant in Regulating Bone Regeneration in Human Postextraction Tooth Sockets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Marginal Bone Level and Biomechanical Behavior of Titanium-Indexed Abutment Base of Conical Connection Used for Single Ceramic Crowns on Morse-Taper Implant: A Clinical Retrospective Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Survival Rates and Factors Affecting the Outcome Following Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Diabetes Mellitus and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present review aimed to evaluate the difference of dental implant failure rates and marginal bone loss (MBL) between implants inserted in fresh extraction sockets or healed sites. Electronic search was undertaken in three databases, plus manual search of journals, including studies randomized or not. Meta-analyses were performed besides meta-regressions, in order to verify how the odds ratio (OR) and MBL were associated with follow-up time. The review included 163 publications. Altogether, there were 17,278 and 38,738 implants placed in fresh extraction sockets and healed sites, respectively. Pairwise meta-analyses showed that implants in sockets had a higher failure risk in comparison to healed sites: OR 1.349, all studies included; OR 2.070, only prospective non-RCTs; OR 2.487, only RCTs (all
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.