Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34947422›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Reversal of Osseointegration as a Novel Perspective for the Removal of Failed Dental Implants: A Review of Five Patented Methods.

Rolf G Winnen, Kristian Kniha, Ali Modabber, Faruk Al-Sibai, Andreas Braun, Reinhold Kneer, Frank Hölzle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Thermal necrosis-aided dental implant removal: A rabbit model pilot study.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rolf G WinnenPrivate Practice, 40217 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5601-2447
Kristian KnihaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8579-2622
Ali ModabberDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2160-4527
Faruk Al-SibaiInstitute of Heat and Mass Transfer, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany.
Andreas BraunClinic for Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7801-040X
Reinhold KneerInstitute of Heat and Mass Transfer, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4676-2978
Frank HölzleDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osseointegration is the basis of successful dental implantology and the foundation of cementless arthroplasty and the osseointegrated percutaneous prosthetic system. Osseointegration has been considered irreversible thus far. However, controlled heating or cooling of dental implants could selectively damage the bone at the bone-implant interface, causing the reversal of osseointegration or "osseodisintegration". This review compares five methods for implant removal, published as patent documents between 2010 and 2018, which have not yet been discussed in the scientific literature. We describe these methods and evaluate their potential for reversing osseointegration. The five methods have several technical and methodological similarities: all methods include a handpiece, a connecting device for coronal access, and a controlling device, as well as the application of mechanical and/or thermal energy. The proposed method of quantifying the temperature with a sensor as the sole means for regulating the process seems inadequate. A database used in one of the methods, however, allows a more precise correlation between a selected implant and the energy needed for its removal, thus avoiding unnecessary trauma to the patient. A flapless, microinvasive, and bone-conserving approach for removing failed dental implants, facilitating successful reimplantation, would benefit dental implantology. These methods could be adapted to cementless medical implants and osseointegrated percutaneous prosthetics. However, for some of the methods discussed herein, further research may be necessary.

Indexed as

dental implantsexplantationfailed implantsimplant removalreimplantationreversibility of osseointegration

Identifiers

PMID34947422
PMCPMC8707383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.