Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34947384›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance between CAD/CAM Materials for Interim Fixed Prosthesis.

Cristian Abad-Coronel, Elena Carrera, Nancy Mena Córdova, Jorge I Fajardo, Paulina Aliaga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Comparative In Vitro Study of Materials for Provisional Restorations Manufactured With Additive (3Dprinting), Subtractive (Milling), and Conventional Techniques.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cristian Abad-CoronelProsthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito 170901, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-5326-681X
Elena CarreraProsthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito 170901, Ecuador.
Nancy Mena CórdovaProsthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito 170901, Ecuador.
Jorge I FajardoMechanical Engineering Faculty, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Cuenca 170517, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0003-1047-398X
Paulina AliagaFaculty of Dentistry, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito 170901, Ecuador.
Universidad San Francisco de Quito · ECPolitecnica Salesiana University · ECUniversity of Cuenca · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the resistance to fracture of interim restorations obtained through additive techniques (3D impressions) and subtractive techniques (milling) using a computer-aided design and manufacture (CAD/CAM) system of a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) to ascertain its clinical importance. (1) Materials and methods: In total, 40 samples were manufactured and divided into two groups (

Indexed as

CAD/CAMCAD/CAM materialsfracture resistanceinterim restorationsrapid prototyping

Identifiers

PMID34947384
PMCPMC8706852
OpenAlexW4200509157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.