ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
A Predictive Mimicker of Fracture Behavior in Fiber Reinforced Concrete Using Machine Learning.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the Effect of Processing and Material Parameters of Alginate Dialdehyde-Gelatin (ADA-GEL)-Based Hydrogels on Stiffness by XGB Machine Learning Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- XGB Modeling Reveals Improvement of Compressive Strength of Cement-Based Composites with Addition of HPMC and Chitosan.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Systematic literature review on the application of machine learning for the prediction of properties of different types of concrete.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Highly Functional Lightweight Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Based on Deep Neural Network and Ensemble Regression Trees Methods.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the exceptional qualities of fiber reinforced concrete, its application is expanding day by day. However, its mixed design is mainly based on extensive experimentations. This study aims to construct a machine learning model capable of predicting the fracture behavior of all conceivable fiber reinforced concrete subclasses, especially strain hardening engineered cementitious composites. This study evaluates 15x input parameters that include the ingredients of the mixed design and the fiber properties. As a result, it predicts, for the first time, the post-peak fracture behavior of fiber-reinforced concrete matrices. Five machine learning models are developed, and their outputs are compared. These include artificial neural networks, the support vector machine, the classification and regression tree, the Gaussian process of regression, and the extreme gradient boosting tree. Due to the small size of the available dataset, this article employs a unique technique called the generative adversarial network to build a virtual data set to augment the data and improve accuracy. The results indicate that the extreme gradient boosting tree model has the lowest error and, therefore, the best mimicker in predicting fiber reinforced concrete properties. This article is anticipated to provide a considerable improvement in the recipe design of effective fiber reinforced concrete formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.