Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34947202›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Produced Water Treatment with Conventional Adsorbents and MOF as an Alternative: A Review.

Humaira Gul Zaman, Lavania Baloo, Rajashekhar Pendyala, Pradeep Kumar Singa, Suhaib Umer Ilyas, Shamsul Rahman Mohamed Kutty

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Controlled Secondary Growth of CAU-1-NHLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Recyclable Materials for Ecofriendly Technology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Humaira Gul ZamanCivil and Environmental Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia.
Lavania BalooCivil and Environmental Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia.
Rajashekhar PendyalaChemical Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5100-9692
Pradeep Kumar SingaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College Bidar, Bidar 585403, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6227-3384
Suhaib Umer IlyasInstitute of Hydrocarbon Recovery, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-7690-0668
Shamsul Rahman Mohamed KuttyCivil and Environmental Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia.
Universiti Teknologi Petronas · MYGuru Nanak Dev University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large volume of produced water (PW) has been produced as a result of extensive industrialization and rising energy demands. PW comprises organic and inorganic pollutants, such as oil, heavy metals, aliphatic hydrocarbons, and radioactive materials. The increase in PW volume globally may result in irreversible environmental damage due to the pollutants' complex nature. Several conventional treatment methods, including physical, chemical, and biological methods, are available for produced water treatment that can reduce the environmental damages. Studies have shown that adsorption is a useful technique for PW treatment and may be more effective than conventional techniques. However, the application of adsorption when treating PW is not well recorded. In the current review, the removal efficiencies of adsorbents in PW treatment are critically analyzed. An overview is provided on the merits and demerits of the adsorption techniques, focusing on overall water composition, regulatory discharge limits, and the hazardous effects of the pollutants. Moreover, this review highlights a potential alternative to conventional technologies, namely, porous adsorbent materials known as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), demonstrating their significance and efficiency in removing contaminants. This study suggests ways to overcome the existing limitations of conventional adsorbents, which include low surface area and issues with reuse and regeneration. Moreover, it is concluded that there is a need to develop highly porous, efficient, eco-friendly, cost-effective, mechanically stable, and sustainable MOF hybrids for produced water treatment.

Indexed as

adsorbentsadsorptionmetal–organic frameworks (MOFs)produced watersustainabilitywater treatment

Identifiers

PMID34947202
PMCPMC8707545
OpenAlexW4200172775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.