Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34947142›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Evaluation of Stress Distribution during Insertion of Tapered Dental Implants in Various Osteotomy Techniques: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.

Jaideep Mahendra, Yemineni Bhavan Chand, Little Mahendra, Hytham N Fageeh, Hammam Ibrahim Fageeh, Wael Ibraheem, Khaled M Alzahrani, Nasser M Alqahtani, Nasser Mesfer Alahmari, Mohammad Almagbol and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Jaideep MahendraDepartment of Periodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai 600095, India.
Yemineni Bhavan ChandDepartment of Dental and Oral Surgery, ASRAM Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, West Godavari District, Eluru 534005, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3035-1576
Little MahendraDepartment of Periodontics, Maktoum Bin Hamdan Dental University, Dubai 213620, United Arab Emirates.
Hytham N FageehDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8208-4855
Hammam Ibrahim FageehDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Wael IbraheemDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Khaled M AlzahraniDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin AbdulAziz University, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5753-6725
Nasser M AlqahtaniDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.
Nasser Mesfer AlahmariDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad AlmagbolDepartment of Community and Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.
Ali RobaianConservative Dental Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Nasina JigeeshDepartment of Operations & Information Technology, IBS Hyderabad, ICFAI Foundation for Higher Education, Hyderabad 501203, India.
Saranya VaradarajanDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai 600130, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7051-1143
Thodur Madapusi BalajiTagore Dental College and Hospital, Chennai 600127, India.
Shankargouda PatilDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, Division of Oral Pathology, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45412, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7246-5497
Jazan University · SAKing Khalid University · SAPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAHamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University · AEICFAI Foundation for Higher Education · INMeenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital · INRagas Dental College & Hospital · INSri Venkateswara Medical College and Ruia Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional osteotomy techniques can, in some cases, induce higher stress on bone during implant insertion as a result of higher torque. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the stress exerted on the underlying osseous tissues during the insertion of a tapered implant using different osteotomy techniques through a dynamic finite element analysis which has been widely applied to study biomedical problems through computer-aided software. In three different types of osteotomy techniques, namely conventional (B1), bone tap (B2), and countersink (B3), five models and implants designed per technique were prepared, implant insertion was simulated, and stress exerted by the implant during each was evaluated. Comparison of stress scores on the cortical and cancellous bone at different time points and time intervals from initiation of insertion to the final placement of the implant was made. There was a highly statistically significant difference between B1 and B2 (

Indexed as

bone tapcortical bonecountersinkfinite element analysisimplantosteotomystress distributionvon mises

Identifiers

PMID34947142
PMCPMC8704667
OpenAlexW4200349338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.