Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34947028›Full record

ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Beta-D-Glucan in Patients with Haematological Malignancies.

Malgorzata Mikulska, Elisa Balletto, Elio Castagnola, Alessandra Mularoni

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Invasive fusariosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Sensitivity of Serum Beta-D-Glucan in Candidemia According toJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Effects of Various Immunoglobulin Products on Serum (1-3)-β-D-glucan Levels.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Malgorzata MikulskaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5535-4602
Elisa BallettoDivision of Infectious Diseases, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Elio CastagnolaInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genova, Italy.
Alessandra MularoniIRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITIstituto Giannina Gaslini · ITIstituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1-3)-beta-D-glucan (BDG) is an almost panfungal marker (absent in zygomycetes and most cryptococci), which can be successfully used in screening and diagnostic testing in patients with haematological malignancies if its advantages and limitations are known. The aim of this review is to report the data, particularly from the last 5 years, on the use of BDG in haematological population. Published data report mainly on the performance of the Fungitell™ assay, although several others are currently available, and they vary in method and cut-off of positivity. The sensitivity of BDG for invasive fungal disease (IFD) in haematology patients seems lower than in other populations, possibly because of the type of IFD (lower sensitivity was found in case of aspergillosis compared to candidiasis and pneumocystosis) or the use of prophylaxis. The specificity of the test can be improved by using two consecutive positive assays and avoiding testing in the case of the concomitant presence of factors associated with false positive results. BDG should be used in combination with clinical assessment and other diagnostic tests, both radiological and mycological, to provide maximum information. Good performance of BDG in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been reported. BDG is a useful diagnostic method in haematology patients, particularly for pneumocystosis or initial diagnosis of invasive fungal infections.

Indexed as

aspergillosiscerebral infectionglucaninvasive fungal infectionsneutropeniapneumocystosis

Identifiers

PMID34947028
PMCPMC8706797
OpenAlexW4200373432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.