Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34946907›Full record

ArticleGenes2021

Optical Genome Mapping in Routine Human Genetic Diagnostics-Its Advantages and Limitations.

Paul Dremsek, Thomas Schwarz, Beatrix Weil, Alina Malashka, Franco Laccone, Jürgen Neesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ring chromosomes uncovered by optical genome mapping: impact of telomeric-associated regions and reference genome selection on structural variant interpretation.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Detection of a complex chromosomal rearrangement in a novel mouse mutant by optical genome mapping.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. [Research progress on copy number alterations in pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul DremsekInstitute of Medical Genetics, Center for Pathobiochemistry and Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Thomas SchwarzInstitute of Medical Genetics, Center for Pathobiochemistry and Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Beatrix WeilInstitute of Medical Genetics, Center for Pathobiochemistry and Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Alina MalashkaInstitute of Medical Genetics, Center for Pathobiochemistry and Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Franco LacconeInstitute of Medical Genetics, Center for Pathobiochemistry and Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Jürgen NeesenInstitute of Medical Genetics, Center for Pathobiochemistry and Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, optical genome mapping (OGM) has developed into a highly promising method of detecting large-scale structural variants in human genomes. It is capable of detecting structural variants considered difficult to detect by other current methods. Hence, it promises to be feasible as a first-line diagnostic tool, permitting insight into a new realm of previously unknown variants. However, due to its novelty, little experience with OGM is available to infer best practices for its application or to clarify which features cannot be detected. In this study, we used the Saphyr system (Bionano Genomics, San Diego, CA, USA), to explore its capabilities in human genetic diagnostics. To this end, we tested 14 DNA samples to confirm a total of 14 different structural or numerical chromosomal variants originally detected by other means, namely, deletions, duplications, inversions, trisomies, and a translocation. Overall, 12 variants could be confirmed; one deletion and one inversion could not. The prerequisites for detection of similar variants were explored by reviewing the OGM data of 54 samples analyzed in our laboratory. Limitations, some owing to the novelty of the method and some inherent to it, were described. Finally, we tested the successful application of OGM in routine diagnostics and described some of the challenges that merit consideration when utilizing OGM as a diagnostic tool.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsDNA Copy Number VariationsGenome, HumanChromosome DisordersChromosome MappingFemaleHumansKaryotypingMalecytogeneticscytogenomicsnumerical chromosomal aberrationsOGMoptical genome mappingroutine genetic testingstructural chromosomal aberrations

Identifiers

PMID34946907
PMCPMC8701374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.