Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34946896›Full record

ArticleGenes2021

A Comprehensive Survey of Statistical Approaches for Differential Expression Analysis in Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Studies.

Samarendra Das, Anil Rai, Michael L Merchant, Matthew C Cave, Shesh N Rai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Top-down proteomics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Single-Cell Multiomics.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samarendra DasDivision of Statistical Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, PUSA, New Delhi 110012, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0263-7027
Anil RaiCentre for Agricultural Bioinformatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, PUSA, New Delhi 110012, India.
Michael L MerchantDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Matthew C CaveBiostatistics and Informatics Facility, Center for Integrative Environmental Health Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Shesh N RaiBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, JG Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8377-353X

Funding

Understanding the Host-Microbiome-Therapeutic Triad: Implications for Designing Alternative IntravaginalP20GM125504 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI James Tristan Collins · 2018 to 2026
$24.4M
Role of oxidized linoleic acid metabolites in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver diseaseP20GM113226 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI GHARE, SMITA S · 2016 to 2025
$24.1M
The role of ECM-mediated mechanosignaling on regional immunosuppression in GBMP20GM135004 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI JUN YAN · 2020 to 2026
$21.1M
ConProject-006U54HL120163 · NHLBI · AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION · PI BHATNAGAR, ARUNI, ROBERTSON, ROSE MARIE · 2018 to 2022
$18.8M
Superfund Training CoreP42ES023716 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI FORTNER, JOHN · 2017 to 2025
$18.1M
The Role of Nutrition in the Development/Progression of Alcohol-Induced Organ InjuryP50AA024337 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI SHIRISH S BARVE · 2016 to 2026
$17.9M
University of Louisville Center for Integrative Environmental Health SciencesP30ES030283 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI J CHRISTOPHER STATES · 2020 to 2026
$10.0M
TBDP30GM127607 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HILL, BRADFORD GUY · 2018 to 2022
$6.3M
Urban Greenness and Cardiovascular HealthR01ES029846 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI Aruni Bhatnagar · 2018 to 2026
$6.2M
Mechanism for arsenic induced carcinogenesisR01ES027778 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI J CHRISTOPHER STATES · 2017 to 2026
$4.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA024337NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES030283NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES023716NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027778NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM113226NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM125504NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM135004NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM127607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a recent high-throughput sequencing technique for studying gene expressions at the cell level. Differential Expression (DE) analysis is a major downstream analysis of scRNA-seq data. DE analysis the in presence of noises from different sources remains a key challenge in scRNA-seq. Earlier practices for addressing this involved borrowing methods from bulk RNA-seq, which are based on non-zero differences in average expressions of genes across cell populations. Later, several methods specifically designed for scRNA-seq were developed. To provide guidance on choosing an appropriate tool or developing a new one, it is necessary to comprehensively study the performance of DE analysis methods. Here, we provide a review and classification of different DE approaches adapted from bulk RNA-seq practice as well as those specifically designed for scRNA-seq. We also evaluate the performance of 19 widely used methods in terms of 13 performance metrics on 11 real scRNA-seq datasets. Our findings suggest that some bulk RNA-seq methods are quite competitive with the single-cell methods and their performance depends on the underlying models, DE test statistic(s), and data characteristics. Further, it is difficult to obtain the method which will be best-performing globally through individual performance criterion. However, the multi-criteria and combined-data analysis indicates that DECENT and EBSeq are the best options for DE analysis. The results also reveal the similarities among the tested methods in terms of detecting common DE genes. Our evaluation provides proper guidelines for selecting the proper tool which performs best under particular experimental settings in the context of the scRNA-seq.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsDatabases, Nucleic AcidGene Expression ProfilingHumansMiceRNA-SeqSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisSoftwarecombined data settingsdifferential expressionmultiple criteria decision makingscRNA-seqstatistical modelsTOPSIS

Identifiers

PMID34946896
PMCPMC8701051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.