ArticleGenes2021
A Comprehensive Survey of Statistical Approaches for Differential Expression Analysis in Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Studies.
Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Charting the human-specific properties of gene expression networks in the infant prefrontal cortex.Science advances · 2026Article
- Confidence: a web app for cross-platform differential gene expression analysis, gene scoring, and enrichment analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From bulk RNA sequencing to spatial transcriptomics: a comparative review of differential gene expression analysis methods.Human genomics · 2025Review
- Bioinformatics perspectives on transcriptomics: A comprehensive review of bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing analyses.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
- DeepExDC interprets genomic compartmentalization changes in single-cell Hi-C data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Exploring and mitigating shortcomings in single-cell differential expression analysis with a new statistical paradigm.Genome biology · 2025Article
- gSELECT: A novel pre-analysis machine-learning library enabling early hypothesis testing and predictive gene selection in single-cell data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Bayesian-frequentist hybrid inference framework for single cell RNA-seq analyses.Human genomics · 2024Article
- Article
- Top-down proteomics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2024Article
- Bayesian-frequentist hybrid inference framework for single cell RNA-seq analyses.Research square · 2023Article
- Single-Cell Multiomics.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2023Review
- Deciphering the Biology of Circulating Tumor Cells through Single-Cell RNA Sequencing: Implications for Precision Medicine in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023Review
- Intracellular pH dynamics regulates intestinal stem cell lineage specification.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- A Novel Algorithm for Feature Selection Using Penalized Regression with Applications to Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data.Biology · 2022Article
- Differential Expression Analysis of Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data: Current Statistical Approaches and Outstanding Challenges.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a recent high-throughput sequencing technique for studying gene expressions at the cell level. Differential Expression (DE) analysis is a major downstream analysis of scRNA-seq data. DE analysis the in presence of noises from different sources remains a key challenge in scRNA-seq. Earlier practices for addressing this involved borrowing methods from bulk RNA-seq, which are based on non-zero differences in average expressions of genes across cell populations. Later, several methods specifically designed for scRNA-seq were developed. To provide guidance on choosing an appropriate tool or developing a new one, it is necessary to comprehensively study the performance of DE analysis methods. Here, we provide a review and classification of different DE approaches adapted from bulk RNA-seq practice as well as those specifically designed for scRNA-seq. We also evaluate the performance of 19 widely used methods in terms of 13 performance metrics on 11 real scRNA-seq datasets. Our findings suggest that some bulk RNA-seq methods are quite competitive with the single-cell methods and their performance depends on the underlying models, DE test statistic(s), and data characteristics. Further, it is difficult to obtain the method which will be best-performing globally through individual performance criterion. However, the multi-criteria and combined-data analysis indicates that DECENT and EBSeq are the best options for DE analysis. The results also reveal the similarities among the tested methods in terms of detecting common DE genes. Our evaluation provides proper guidelines for selecting the proper tool which performs best under particular experimental settings in the context of the scRNA-seq.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.