Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34946831›Full record

ReviewGenes2021

DNA Damage Responses during the Cell Cycle: Insights from Model Organisms and Beyond.

Delisa E Clay, Donald T Fox

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. BPTF is essential for vaccine-induced germinal center B cell responses.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2026
    Article
  7. Growth under pressure: The pros and cons of polyploidy induced by stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. In Situ ThaiPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Delisa E ClayDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Donald T FoxDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0436-179X
Duke University · US

Funding

Training Program in Developmental & Stem Cell BiologyT32HD040372 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Terry H Lechler · 2001 to 2026
$8.9M
Polyploidy after tissue injury: a Drosophila modelR01GM118447 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FOX, DONALD T. · 2016 to 2025
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040372NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome damage is a threat to all organisms. To respond to such damage, DNA damage responses (DDRs) lead to cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and cell death. Many DDR components are highly conserved, whereas others have adapted to specific organismal needs. Immense progress in this field has been driven by model genetic organism research. This review has two main purposes. First, we provide a survey of model organism-based efforts to study DDRs. Second, we highlight how model organism study has contributed to understanding how specific DDRs are influenced by cell cycle stage. We also look forward, with a discussion of how future study can be expanded beyond typical model genetic organisms to further illuminate how the genome is protected.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell Cycle CheckpointsDNA DamageDNA RepairHumansSignal Transductioncell cycleDNA damageDNA repairmodel organisms

Identifiers

PMID34946831
PMCPMC8701014
OpenAlexW3216498953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.