Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34946816›Full record

ArticleGenes2021

Ethics as Lived Practice. Anticipatory Capacity and Ethical Decision-Making in Forensic Genetics.

Matthias Wienroth, Rafaela Granja, Veronika Lipphardt, Emmanuel Nsiah Amoako, Carole McCartney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthias WienrothCentre for Crime and Policing, Department of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9722-3918
Rafaela GranjaCommunication and Society Research Centre, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4430-9061
Veronika LipphardtUniversity College Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, 79098 Freiburg, Germany.
Emmanuel Nsiah AmoakoDepartment of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK.
Carole McCartneyScience & Justice Research Interest Group, Law School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0781-5619

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Greater scrutiny and demands for innovation and increased productivity place pressures on scientists. Forensic genetics is advancing at a rapid pace but can only do so responsibly, usefully, and acceptably within ethical and legal boundaries. We argue that such boundaries require that forensic scientists embrace 'ethics as lived practice'. As a starting point, we critically discuss 'thin' ethics in forensic genetics, which lead to a myopic focus on procedures, and to seeing 'privacy' as the sole ethical concern and technology as a mere tool. To overcome 'thin' ethics in forensic genetics, we instead propose understanding ethics as an intrinsic part of the lived practice of a scientist. Therefore, we explore, within the context of three case studies of emerging forensic genetics technologies, ethical aspects of decision-making in forensic genetics research and in technology use. We discuss the creation, curation, and use of databases, and the need to engage with societal and policing contexts of forensic practice. We argue that open communication is a vital ethical aspect. Adoption of 'ethics as lived practice' supports the development of anticipatory capacity-empowering scientists to understand, and act within ethical and legal boundaries, incorporating the operational and societal impacts of their daily decisions, and making visible ethical decision making in scientific practice.

Indexed as

Decision MakingForensic GeneticsForensic SciencesHumanscommunicationdatabasedecision-makingethicsethics as lived practiceforensic DNA phenotypingforensic epigeneticsforensic genealogyforensic geneticsgenetic databasing

Identifiers

PMID34946816
PMCPMC8701090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.