Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34946705›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

DNA-Based Electrodes and Computational Approaches on the Intercalation Study of Antitumoral Drugs.

Edson Silvio Batista Rodrigues, Isaac Yves Lopes de Macêdo, Giovanna Nascimento de Mello E Silva, Arthur de Carvalho E Silva, Henric Pietro Vicente Gil, Bruno Junior Neves, Eric de Souza Gil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edson Silvio Batista RodriguesLafam-Laboratory for Pharmaceutical and Environmental Analysis, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74605-170, Brazil.
Isaac Yves Lopes de MacêdoLafam-Laboratory for Pharmaceutical and Environmental Analysis, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74605-170, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6043-5343
Giovanna Nascimento de Mello E SilvaLafam-Laboratory for Pharmaceutical and Environmental Analysis, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74605-170, Brazil.
Arthur de Carvalho E SilvaLabMol-Laboratory for Molecular Modeling and Drug Design, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74605-170, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9866-3344
Henric Pietro Vicente GilLabMol-Laboratory for Molecular Modeling and Drug Design, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74605-170, Brazil.
Bruno Junior NevesLabMol-Laboratory for Molecular Modeling and Drug Design, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74605-170, Brazil.
Eric de Souza GilLafam-Laboratory for Pharmaceutical and Environmental Analysis, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74605-170, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9161-0127

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior scolarshipFundação de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás 07/2016National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 40287/2018-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The binding between anticancer drugs and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is a key issue to understand their mechanism of action, and many chemical methods have been explored on this task. Molecular docking techniques successfully predict the affinity of small molecules into the DNA binding sites. In turn, various DNA-targeted drugs are electroactive; in this regard, their electrochemical behavior may change according to the nature and strength of interaction with DNA. A carbon paste electrode (CPE) modified with calf thymus ds-DNA (CPDE) and computational methods were used to evaluate the drug-DNA intercalation of doxorubicin (DOX), daunorubicin (DAU), idarubicin (IDA), dacarbazine (DAR), mitoxantrone (MIT), and methotrexate (MTX), aiming to evaluate eventual correlations. CPE and CPDE were immersed in pH 7 0.1 mM solutions of each drug with different incubation times. As expected, the CPDE response for all DNA-targeted drugs was higher than that of CPE, evidencing the drug-DNA interaction. A peak current increase of up to 10-fold was observed; the lowest increase was seen for MTX, and the highest increase for MIT. Although this increase in the sensitivity is certainly tied to preconcentration effects of DNA, the data did not agree entirely with docking studies, evidencing the participation of other factors, such as viscosity, interfacial electrostatic interactions, and coefficient of diffusion.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationAntineoplastic AgentsDNAIntercalating AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsDNAIntercalating AgentsDNA intercalationelectrocatalysisintermolecular interactionsmolecular dockingvoltammetry

Identifiers

PMID34946705
PMCPMC8709249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.