Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34946546›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Emerging Therapeutic Agents for Colorectal Cancer.

Marianna Nalli, Michela Puxeddu, Giuseppe La Regina, Stefano Gianni, Romano Silvestri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. NovelACS pharmacology & translational science · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marianna NalliDepartment of Drug Chemistry and Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2774-6868
Michela PuxedduDepartment of Drug Chemistry and Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe La ReginaDepartment of Drug Chemistry and Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3252-1161
Stefano GianniDepartment of Biochemical Sciences "Rossi Fanelli", Institute of Biology and Molecular Pathology of CNR, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Romano SilvestriDepartment of Drug Chemistry and Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2489-0178

Funding

Institute Pasteur Italy Call 2019 aged under 45Italian Association for Cancer Research IG2020 24703Sapienza University of Rome RM11916B5598E3C4Sapienza University of Rome RP11715C34AEAC9BSapienza University of Rome RP11715C7D1CF0D1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are promising new therapeutic agents for CRC patients, including novel small-molecule inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockers. We focused on emerging CRC's therapeutic agents that have shown the potential for progress in clinical practice. This review provides an overview of tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting VEGF and KIT, BRAF and MEK inhibitors, TLR9 agonist, STAT3 inhibitors, and immune checkpoint blockers (PD1/PDL-1 inhibitors), for which recent advances have been reported. These new agents have the potential to provide benefits to CRC patients with unmet medical needs.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm ProteinsProtein Kinase InhibitorsHumansNeoplasm ProteinsProtein Kinase Inhibitorsanticancer agentscancerCRCemerging targets

Identifiers

PMID34946546
PMCPMC8707340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.