Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34946480›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

To Work or Not to Work, That Is the Question: The Psychological Impact of the First COVID-19 Lockdown on the Elderly, Healthcare Workers, and Virtual Workers.

Silvia Andreassi, Silvia Monaco, Sergio Salvatore, Gaetano Maria Sciabica, Giulio De Felice, Elena Petrovska, Rachele Mariani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Remote Work, Well-Being, and Healthy Labor Force Participation Among Older Adults: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  2. Exploring Radiologists' Burnout in the COVID-19 Era: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  3. Loneliness in Young Adult Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Silvia AndreassiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies Sapienza, University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1556-1671
Silvia MonacoDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies Sapienza, University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6838-7537
Sergio SalvatoreDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies Sapienza, University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4583-8478
Gaetano Maria SciabicaDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies Sapienza, University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Giulio De FeliceXenophon College London, University of Chichester, Chichester PO19 6PE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6993-0914
Elena PetrovskaDerner School of Psychology, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York, NY 11530-0701, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5536-7956
Rachele MarianiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies Sapienza, University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5952-3525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spread of COVID-19 created a state of emergency all over the world and played a big role in the decline of the mental health of citizens. The context of the workplace became an important variable in the impact of the lockdown on individuals. In this study, we deepened the categories of healthcare workers (HWs), virtual workers (VWs), and the elderly, along with their emotional approach to this emergency. A sample of 257 participants (ElderlyN = 62; HWsN = 104; VWsN = 91) completed: a semi-structured interview on their experience during lockdown via telephone; an online survey with a sociodemographic questionnaire; the Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale (DERS); and the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). Linguistic measures of the Referential Process were utilized to code the interviews. An independent ANOVA explored the variability among groups. The results show more affective language in the Elderly (M = 0.0310, SD = 0.0070) and a growth in spirituality (M = 4.16, SD = 3.17). HWs displayed a higher PTGI (M = 56.84, SD = 20.29), while VWs displayed a lower PTGI (M = 50.02, SD = 21.05). Moreover, VWs presented higher scores in Impulse on the DERS (M = 11.67, SD = 5.05) and a more cognitive/abstract narration (Reflection IREF M = 0.0260, SD = 0.0071; Reorganization IWRRL M = 0.5419, SD = 0.0032; Referential Activity IWRAD M = 0.4978, SD = 0.0029). This study aims to take the work context into consideration to create focused interventions.

Indexed as

coronavirus pandemicemotional regulationnarrativespost-traumatic growthreferential activity

Identifiers

PMID34946480
PMCPMC8701455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.