ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021
DeepDRG: Performance of Artificial Intelligence Model for Real-Time Prediction of Diagnosis-Related Groups.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-assisted medical coding and DRG management: current applications, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Application of Clinical Department-Specific AI-Assisted Coding Using Taiwan Diagnosis-Related Groups: Retrospective Validation Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Analysis and optimization of inpatient cost structure for fracture patients under the implementation of the DRG policy.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Deep learning for cardiovascular management: optimizing pathways and cost control under diagnosis-related group models.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Achieving Robust Medical Coding in DRGs Systems: Innovative Actions Adopted in Greece.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- DRG-LLaMA : tuning LLaMA model to predict diagnosis-related group for hospitalized patients.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Comprehensive evaluation of disease coding quality in gastroenterology and its impact on the diagnosis-related group system: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Prediction of Diagnosis-Related Groups for Appendectomy Patients Using C4.5 and Neural Network.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Optimizing the Implementation of Clinical Predictive Models to Minimize National Costs: Sepsis Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Reducing the Risk of Upcoding in DRG Grouping Through a Two-Stage DRG Grouper Based on Machine Learning.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, the use of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) has been increased to claim reimbursement for inpatient care. The overall benefits of using DRGs depend upon the accuracy of clinical coding to obtain reasonable reimbursement. However, the selection of appropriate codes is always challenging and requires professional expertise. The rate of incorrect DRGs is always high due to the heavy workload, poor quality of documentation, and lack of computer assistance. We therefore developed deep learning (DL) models to predict the primary diagnosis for appropriate reimbursement and improving hospital performance. A dataset consisting of 81,486 patients with 128,105 episodes was used for model training and testing. Patients' age, sex, drugs, diseases, laboratory tests, procedures, and operation history were used as inputs to our multiclass prediction model. Gated recurrent unit (GRU) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were developed to predict 200 primary diagnoses. The performance of the DL models was measured by the area under the receiver operating curve, precision, recall, and F1 score. Of the two DL models, the GRU method, had the best performance in predicting the primary diagnosis (AUC: 0.99, precision: 83.2%, and recall: 66.0%). However, the performance of ANN model for DRGs prediction achieved AUC of 0.99 with a precision of 0.82 and recall of 0.57. The findings of our study show that DL algorithms, especially GRU, can be used to develop DRGs prediction models for identifying primary diagnosis accurately. DeepDRGs would help to claim appropriate financial incentives, enable proper utilization of medical resources, and improve hospital performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.