Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34946069›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2021

Bernard R Glick, Francisco X Nascimento

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Exogenous KFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Drought Tolerant Capability of Pineapple [Tropical life sciences research · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Inoculation withPeerJ · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bernard R GlickDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1729-4258
Francisco X NascimentoiBET, Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Apartado 12, 2781-901 Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1184-3794
Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica · PTUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expression of the enzyme 1-aminocylopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, and the consequent modulation of plant ACC and ethylene concentrations, is one of the most important features of plant-associated bacteria. By decreasing plant ACC and ethylene concentrations, ACC deaminase-producing bacteria can overcome some of the deleterious effects of inhibitory levels of ACC and ethylene in various aspects of plant-microbe interactions, as well as plant growth and development (especially under stressful conditions). As a result, the

Indexed as

1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acidethyleneplant-microbe interactionsPseudomonas

Identifiers

PMID34946069
PMCPMC8707671
OpenAlexW3216128558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.