ArticleMicroorganisms2021
Intensification of Nickel Bioleaching with Neutrophilic Bacteria
Article in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improvement of Li and Mn bioleaching from spent lithium-ion batteries, using step-wise addition of biogenic sulfuric acid byHeliyon · 2024Article
- Current Trends in Metal Biomining with a Focus on Genomics Aspects and Attention to Arsenopyrite Leaching-A Review.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Biogeotechnology, Biocorrosion, and Remediation-Three Areas of Modern Applied Environmental Microbiology.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Metabolism of the GenusMicroorganisms · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hydrometallurgical production of valuable and non-ferrous metals is traditionally accompanied with acid waste effluents/acid mine drainage leading to acidification of the mining areas. The traditional cause of this pollution is the well-known technology based on the recovery of metals with acid solutions and the application of strong acidophilic leaching bacteria for the oxidation of sulfide ores. In our experiments, we used neutrophilic autotrophic bacteria (NAB) stimulated with formic acid or coupled with acidophilic bacteria. The first approach was based on using formic acid as an energetic substrate by autotrophic bacteria. In the second case, the NAB provided initial biogenic acidification for the following growth of the inoculated acidophilic bacteria. Our experiments resulted in increased nickel recovery from the low-grade sulfide ores, which was provided by the NAB in a medium supplemented with formic acid. Bioleaching resulted in 1116 mg Ni/L (69.75%) in the medium with formate and only 35.4 mg Ni/L without formate in 43 days. As a whole, our bench scale experiments showed that the stimulated NAB can be effective at pH 7-5. Partially replacing sulfuric acid with formic acid could also give benefits via the following natural degradation of acid wastes. As a whole, this approach is more environmentally friendly than conventional bioleaching techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.