Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34945948›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Characterizing Topics in Social Media Using Dynamics of Conversation.

James Flamino, Bowen Gong, Frederick Buchanan, Boleslaw K Szymanski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James FlaminoDepartment of Computer Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2753-5481
Bowen GongDepartment of Computer Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0549-501X
Frederick BuchananDepartment of Computer Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA.
Boleslaw K SzymanskiDepartment of Computer Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0307-6743

Funding

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency W911NF-17-C-0099 and HR001121C0165United States Army Research Office W911NF-16-1-0524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online social media provides massive open-ended platforms for users of a wide variety of backgrounds, interests, and beliefs to interact and debate, facilitating countless discussions across a myriad of subjects. With numerous unique voices being lent to the ever-growing information stream, it is essential to consider how the types of conversations that result from a social media post represent the post itself. We hypothesize that the biases and predispositions of users cause them to react to different topics in different ways not necessarily entirely intended by the sender. In this paper, we introduce a set of unique features that capture patterns of discourse, allowing us to empirically explore the relationship between a topic and the conversations it induces. Utilizing "microscopic" trends to describe "macroscopic" phenomena, we set a paradigm for analyzing information dissemination through the user reactions that arise from a topic, eliminating the need to analyze the involved text of the discussions. Using a Reddit dataset, we find that our features not only enable classifiers to accurately distinguish between content genre, but also can identify more subtle semantic differences in content under a single topic as well as isolating outliers whose subject matter is substantially different from the norm.

Indexed as

information dynamicsnetwork entropysemantic analysistopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID34945948
PMCPMC8700409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.