Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34945943›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021

An Improved Moth-Flame Optimization Algorithm with Adaptation Mechanism to Solve Numerical and Mechanical Engineering Problems.

Mohammad H Nadimi-Shahraki, Ali Fatahi, Hoda Zamani, Seyedali Mirjalili, Laith Abualigah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Moth Flame Optimization: Theory, Modifications, Hybridizations, and Applications.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Mohammad H Nadimi-ShahrakiFaculty of Computer Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad 8514143131, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0135-1115
Ali FatahiFaculty of Computer Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad 8514143131, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-7779-3470
Hoda ZamaniFaculty of Computer Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad 8514143131, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0444-4509
Seyedali MirjaliliCentre for Artificial Intelligence Research and Optimisation, Torrens University Australia, Brisbane 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1443-9458
Laith AbualigahFaculty of Computer Sciences and Informatics, Amman Arab University, Amman 11953, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-2203-4549
Islamic Azad University of Najafabad · IRUniversiti Sains Malaysia · MYYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moth-flame optimization (MFO) algorithm inspired by the transverse orientation of moths toward the light source is an effective approach to solve global optimization problems. However, the MFO algorithm suffers from issues such as premature convergence, low population diversity, local optima entrapment, and imbalance between exploration and exploitation. In this study, therefore, an improved moth-flame optimization (I-MFO) algorithm is proposed to cope with canonical MFO's issues by locating trapped moths in local optimum via defining memory for each moth. The trapped moths tend to escape from the local optima by taking advantage of the adapted wandering around search (AWAS) strategy. The efficiency of the proposed I-MFO is evaluated by CEC 2018 benchmark functions and compared against other well-known metaheuristic algorithms. Moreover, the obtained results are statistically analyzed by the Friedman test on 30, 50, and 100 dimensions. Finally, the ability of the I-MFO algorithm to find the best optimal solutions for mechanical engineering problems is evaluated with three problems from the latest test-suite CEC 2020. The experimental and statistical results demonstrate that the proposed I-MFO is significantly superior to the contender algorithms and it successfully upgrades the shortcomings of the canonical MFO.

Indexed as

mechanical engineering problemsmetaheuristic algorithmsmoth-flame optimizationoptimizationswarm intelligence algorithm

Identifiers

PMID34945943
PMCPMC8700729
OpenAlexW4200292687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.