Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34945786›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021

Comparison of Organoids from Menstrual Fluid and Hormone-Treated Endometrium: Novel Tools for Gynecological Research.

Caitlin E Filby, Katherine A Wyatt, Sally Mortlock, Fiona L Cousins, Brett McKinnon, Kate E Tyson, Grant W Montgomery, Caroline E Gargett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Patient-derived organoids in gynaecological cancers: emerging tools for therapy and disease modelling.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Modelling Endometriosis Using In Vitro and In Vivo Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Current strategies using 3D organoids to establishJournal of veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Addressing Key Questions in Organoid Models: Who, Where, How, and Why?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. New concepts on the etiology of endometriosis.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Strategies for modelling endometrial diseases.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  20. Endometrial Stem/Progenitor Cells: Prospects and Challenges.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Caitlin E FilbyThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2272-5902
Katherine A WyattThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0836-797X
Sally MortlockInstitute for Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Fiona L CousinsThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7064-8596
Brett McKinnonInstitute for Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Kate E TysonObstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
Grant W MontgomeryInstitute for Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4140-8139
Caroline E GargettThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3590-2077
Hudson Institute of Medical Research · AUThe University of Queensland · AUMonash Health · AU

Funding

Australian National Health Medical Research Council Investigator Fellowship 1173882EndoFound N/AVictorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial organoids (EMO) are an important tool for gynecological research but have been limited by generation from (1) invasively acquired tissues and thus advanced disease states and (2) from women who are not taking hormones, thus excluding 50% of the female reproductive-aged population. We sought to overcome these limitations by generating organoids from (1) menstrual fluid (MF; MFO) using a method that enables the concurrent isolation of menstrual fluid supernatant, stromal cells, and leukocytes and (2) from biopsies and hysterectomy samples from women taking hormonal medication (EMO-H). MF was collected in a menstrual cup for 4-6 h on day 2 of menstruation. Biopsies and hysterectomies were obtained during laparoscopic surgery. Organoids were generated from all sample types, with MFO and EMO-H showing similar cell proliferation rates, proportion and localization of the endometrial basalis epithelial marker, Stage Specific Embryonic Antigen-1 (SSEA-1), and gene expression profiles. Organoids from different disease states showed the moderate clustering of epithelial secretory and androgen receptor signaling genes. Thus, MFO and EMO-H are novel organoids that share similar features to EMO but with the advantage of (1) MFO being obtained non-invasively and (2) EMO-H being obtained from 50% of the women who are not currently being studied through standard methods. Thus, MFO and EMO-H are likely to prove to be invaluable tools for gynecological research, enabling the population-wide assessment of endometrial health and personalized medicine.

Indexed as

adenomyosisdisease modellingendometrial organoidsendometriosisgynecologyhormoneshumanmenstrual fluid

Identifiers

PMID34945786
PMCPMC8707872
OpenAlexW4200426280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.