ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021
Documenting Pharmacogenomic Test Results in Electronic Health Records: Practical Considerations for Primary Care Teams.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evidence level for pharmacogenetic testing in antidepressant treatment: a systematic review.PharmacogenomicsPooled it
- Current state of electronic problems lists in primary care: a rapid scoping review.Family practice · 2026Article
- Real-World Characterization of Psychiatric Pharmacogenomic Test Ordering and Clinical Relevance in Adults and Children.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Analyzing the impact of pharmacogenomics-guided nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug alerts in clinical practice.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Scoping review of enablers and challenges of implementing pharmacogenomics testing in the primary care settings.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Pharmacogenetics Clinical Decision Support Systems for Primary Care in England: Co-Design Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Decoding Pharmacogenomic Test Interpretation and Application to Patient Care.Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP · 2024Article
- The emergence, implementation, and future growth of pharmacogenomics in psychiatry: a narrative review.Psychological medicine · 2023Review
- Satisfied or not satisfied? Electronic health records system implementation in Ghana: Health leaders' perspective.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Variability Between Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPICFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With increasing patient interest in and access to pharmacogenomic testing, clinicians practicing in primary care are more likely than ever to encounter a patient seeking or presenting with pharmacogenomic test results. Gene-based prescribing recommendations are available to healthcare providers through Food and Drug Administration-approved drug labeling and Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines. Given the lifelong utility of pharmacogenomic test results to optimize pharmacotherapy for commonly prescribed medications, appropriate documentation of these results in a patient's electronic health record (EHR) is essential. The current "gold standard" for pharmacogenomics implementation includes entering pharmacogenomic test results into EHRs as discrete results with associated clinical decision support (CDS) alerts that will fire at the point of prescribing, similar to drug allergy alerts. However, such infrastructure is limited to the few institutions that have invested in the resources and personnel to develop and maintain it. For the majority of clinicians who do not practice at an institution with a dedicated clinical pharmacogenomics team and integrated pharmacogenomics CDS in the EHR, this report provides practical tips for documenting pharmacogenomic test results in the problem list and allergy field to maximize the visibility and utility of results over time, especially when such results could prevent the occurrence of serious adverse drug reactions or predict therapeutic failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.