ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021
Managing of Unassigned Mass Spectrometric Data by Neural Network for Cancer Phenotypes Classification.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of influenza virus infection based on deep learning and peripheral blood proteomics: A diagnostic study.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- MSMCE: A novel representation module for classification of raw mass spectrometry data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Deep learning facilitates multi-data type analysis and predictive biomarker discovery in cancer precision medicine.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Analysis of Primary Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry Data by Neural Networks for Plant Samples Classification.Metabolites · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mass spectrometric profiling provides information on the protein and metabolic composition of biological samples. However, the weak efficiency of computational algorithms in correlating tandem spectra to molecular components (proteins and metabolites) dramatically limits the use of "omics" profiling for the classification of nosologies. The development of machine learning methods for the intelligent analysis of raw mass spectrometric (HPLC-MS/MS) measurements without involving the stages of preprocessing and data identification seems promising. In our study, we tested the application of neural networks of two types, a 1D residual convolutional neural network (CNN) and a 3D CNN, for the classification of three cancers by analyzing metabolomic-proteomic HPLC-MS/MS data. In this work, we showed that both neural networks could classify the phenotypes of gender-mixed oncology, kidney cancer, gender-specific oncology, ovarian cancer, and the phenotype of a healthy person by analyzing 'omics' data in 'mgf' data format. The created models effectively recognized oncopathologies with a model accuracy of 0.95. Information was obtained on the remoteness of the studied phenotypes. The closest in the experiment were ovarian cancer, kidney cancer, and prostate cancer/kidney cancer. In contrast, the healthy phenotype was the most distant from cancer phenotypes and ovarian and prostate cancers. The neural network makes it possible to not only classify the studied phenotypes, but also to determine their similarity (distance matrix), thus overcoming algorithmic barriers in identifying HPLC-MS/MS spectra. Neural networks are versatile and can be applied to standard experimental data formats obtained using different analytical platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.