Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34945760›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021

Managing of Unassigned Mass Spectrometric Data by Neural Network for Cancer Phenotypes Classification.

Denis V Petrovsky, Arthur T Kopylov, Vladimir R Rudnev, Alexander A Stepanov, Liudmila I Kulikova, Kristina A Malsagova, Anna L Kaysheva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Denis V PetrovskyBiobanking Group, Branch of Institute of Biomedical Chemistry "Scientific and Education Center", 109028 Moscow, Russia.
Arthur T KopylovBiobanking Group, Branch of Institute of Biomedical Chemistry "Scientific and Education Center", 109028 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7199-372X
Vladimir R RudnevBiobanking Group, Branch of Institute of Biomedical Chemistry "Scientific and Education Center", 109028 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander A StepanovBiobanking Group, Branch of Institute of Biomedical Chemistry "Scientific and Education Center", 109028 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9113-9440
Liudmila I KulikovaBiobanking Group, Branch of Institute of Biomedical Chemistry "Scientific and Education Center", 109028 Moscow, Russia.
Kristina A MalsagovaBiobanking Group, Branch of Institute of Biomedical Chemistry "Scientific and Education Center", 109028 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9404-1660
Anna L KayshevaBiobanking Group, Branch of Institute of Biomedical Chemistry "Scientific and Education Center", 109028 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4472-2016

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 75-15-2020-913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometric profiling provides information on the protein and metabolic composition of biological samples. However, the weak efficiency of computational algorithms in correlating tandem spectra to molecular components (proteins and metabolites) dramatically limits the use of "omics" profiling for the classification of nosologies. The development of machine learning methods for the intelligent analysis of raw mass spectrometric (HPLC-MS/MS) measurements without involving the stages of preprocessing and data identification seems promising. In our study, we tested the application of neural networks of two types, a 1D residual convolutional neural network (CNN) and a 3D CNN, for the classification of three cancers by analyzing metabolomic-proteomic HPLC-MS/MS data. In this work, we showed that both neural networks could classify the phenotypes of gender-mixed oncology, kidney cancer, gender-specific oncology, ovarian cancer, and the phenotype of a healthy person by analyzing 'omics' data in 'mgf' data format. The created models effectively recognized oncopathologies with a model accuracy of 0.95. Information was obtained on the remoteness of the studied phenotypes. The closest in the experiment were ovarian cancer, kidney cancer, and prostate cancer/kidney cancer. In contrast, the healthy phenotype was the most distant from cancer phenotypes and ovarian and prostate cancers. The neural network makes it possible to not only classify the studied phenotypes, but also to determine their similarity (distance matrix), thus overcoming algorithmic barriers in identifying HPLC-MS/MS spectra. Neural networks are versatile and can be applied to standard experimental data formats obtained using different analytical platforms.

Indexed as

bioinformaticscancermetabolomicsmultiomics dataneural networkproteomicssystem biology

Identifiers

PMID34945760
PMCPMC8707435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.