Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34945749›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2021

Artificial Intelligence Evidence-Based Current Status and Potential for Lower Limb Vascular Management.

Xenia Butova, Sergey Shayakhmetov, Maxim Fedin, Igor Zolotukhin, Sergio Gianesini

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Humans use tools: From handcrafted tools to artificial intelligence.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Xenia ButovaDepartment of Fundamental and Applied Research in Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Sergey ShayakhmetovDepartment of Radiotechnics, Faculty of Technical Cybernetics, National Research University of Electronic Technology, 124498 Moscow, Russia.
Maxim FedinDepartment of Data Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia.
Igor ZolotukhinDepartment of Fundamental and Applied Research in Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6563-0471
Sergio GianesiniDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0440-5975
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RUMonash University · AUNational Research University of Electronic Technology · RUUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consultation prioritization is fundamental in optimal healthcare management and its performance can be helped by artificial intelligence (AI)-dedicated software and by digital medicine in general. The need for remote consultation has been demonstrated not only in the pandemic-induced lock-down but also in rurality conditions for which access to health centers is constantly limited. The term "AI" indicates the use of a computer to simulate human intellectual behavior with minimal human intervention. AI is based on a "machine learning" process or on an artificial neural network. AI provides accurate diagnostic algorithms and personalized treatments in many fields, including oncology, ophthalmology, traumatology, and dermatology. AI can help vascular specialists in diagnostics of peripheral artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and deep vein thrombosis by analyzing contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound data and in diagnostics of pulmonary embolism on multi-slice computed angiograms. Automatic methods based on AI may be applied to detect the presence and determine the clinical class of chronic venous disease. Nevertheless, data on using AI in this field are still scarce. In this narrative review, the authors discuss available data on AI implementation in arterial and venous disease diagnostics and care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencechronic venous diseasedeep machine learningperipheral artery diseasevenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID34945749
PMCPMC8705683
OpenAlexW3214845400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.