Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34945720›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021

Detection of Bone Metastases on Bone Scans through Image Classification with Contrastive Learning.

Te-Chun Hsieh, Chiung-Wei Liao, Yung-Chi Lai, Kin-Man Law, Pak-Ki Chan, Chia-Hung Kao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Te-Chun HsiehDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7302-7683
Chiung-Wei LiaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan.
Yung-Chi LaiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan.
Kin-Man LawCenter of Augmented Intelligence in Healthcare, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan.
Pak-Ki ChanCenter of Augmented Intelligence in Healthcare, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan.
Chia-Hung KaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6368-3676

Funding

China Medical University Hospital DMR-110-089China Medical University Hospital DMR-111-090China Medical University Hospital DMR-111-091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with bone metastases have poor prognoses. A bone scan is a commonly applied diagnostic tool for this condition. However, its accuracy is limited by the nonspecific character of radiopharmaceutical accumulation, which indicates all-cause bone remodeling. The current study evaluated deep learning techniques to improve the efficacy of bone metastasis detection on bone scans, retrospectively examining 19,041 patients aged 22 to 92 years who underwent bone scans between May 2011 and December 2019. We developed several functional imaging binary classification deep learning algorithms suitable for bone scans. The presence or absence of bone metastases as a reference standard was determined through a review of image reports by nuclear medicine physicians. Classification was conducted with convolutional neural network-based (CNN-based), residual neural network (ResNet), and densely connected convolutional networks (DenseNet) models, with and without contrastive learning. Each set of bone scans contained anterior and posterior images with resolutions of 1024 × 256 pixels. A total of 37,427 image sets were analyzed. The overall performance of all models improved with contrastive learning. The accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and negative predictive value (NPV) for the optimal model were 0.961, 0.878, 0.599, 0.712, 0.92 and 0.965, respectively. In particular, the high NPV may help physicians safely exclude bone metastases, decreasing physician workload, and improving patient care.

Indexed as

bone scancontrastive learningconvolutional neural networkdeep learning

Identifiers

PMID34945720
PMCPMC8708961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.