Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Jianying ZhaoNational Center of Meat Quality and Safety Control, Collaborative Innovation Center of Meat Production and Processing, Quality and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Jing QianNational Center of Meat Quality and Safety Control, Collaborative Innovation Center of Meat Production and Processing, Quality and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Hong ZhuangQuality and Safety Assessment Research Unit, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, USDA-ARS, 950 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30605, USA.
Ji LuoCollege of Life Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, China.
Mingming HuangCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China.
Wenjing YanNational Center of Meat Quality and Safety Control, Collaborative Innovation Center of Meat Production and Processing, Quality and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0721-9414
Jianhao ZhangNational Center of Meat Quality and Safety Control, Collaborative Innovation Center of Meat Production and Processing, Quality and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Nanjing Agricultural University · CNAnhui Normal University · CNShandong Agricultural University · CNU.S. National Poultry Research Center · US
Funding
Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Independent Innovation Fund Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Independent Innovation FundNational Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFD0700802project of introducing urgently needed talents in key supporting regions of Shandong Province None
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate effects of plasma-activated solution (PAS) on the cell biology of
Indexed as
cell membraneDNAlettucespeptidoglycanreactive oxygen species
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Effect of Plasma-Activated Solution Treatment on Cell Biology of · full record | OpenQuestion