Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34945372›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2021

A Hydrogel-Based Microfluidic Nerve Cuff for Neuromodulation of Peripheral Nerves.

Raviraj Thakur, Felix P Aplin, Gene Y Fridman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. A Cuff Lead for Delivering Ionic Direct Current (iDC) to Block Neural Activities of Sciatic Nerve.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raviraj ThakurDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Felix P AplinDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Gene Y FridmanDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Safe Direct Current Stimulator (SDCS) technology for blocking chronicperipheral painR01NS110893 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FRIDMAN, GENE YEVGENY · 2020 to 2023
$2.2M
Safe Direct Current for Neuroprosthetic ApplicationsR01NS092726 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FRIDMAN, GENE YEVGENY · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01NS092726NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implantable neuromodulation devices typically have metal in contact with soft, ion-conducting nerves. These neural interfaces excite neurons using short-duration electrical pulses. While this approach has been extremely successful for multiple clinical applications, it is limited in delivering long-duration pulses or direct current (DC), even for acute term studies. When the charge injection capacity of electrodes is exceeded, irreversible electrochemical processes occur, and toxic byproducts are discharged directly onto the nerve, causing biological damage. Hydrogel coatings on electrodes improve the overall charge injection limit and provide a mechanically pliable interface. To further extend this idea, we developed a silicone-based nerve cuff lead with a hydrogel microfluidic conduit. It serves as a thin, soft and flexible interconnection and provides a greater spatial separation between metal electrodes and the target nerve. In an in vivo rat model, we used this cuff to stimulate and record from sciatic nerves, with performance comparable to that of metal electrodes. Further, we delivered DC through the lead in an acute manner to induce nerve block that is reversible. In contrast to most metallic cuff electrodes, which need microfabrication equipment, we built this cuff using a consumer-grade digital cutter and a simplified molding process. Overall, the device will be beneficial to neuromodulation researchers as a general-purpose nerve cuff electrode for peripheral neuromodulation experiments.

Indexed as

bioelectronicsdirect current nerve blocknerve cuff electrodeneural electrodeneural interfaceperipheral nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34945372
PMCPMC8706247
OpenAlexW4200229247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.