Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34945282›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Amyloid Beta Dynamics in Biological Fluids-Therapeutic Impact.

Thomas Gabriel Schreiner, Bogdan Ovidiu Popescu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas Gabriel SchreinerFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4495-4004
Bogdan Ovidiu PopescuFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4826-2598
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iași This work was supported by a publications grant of the TUIASI, project number GI/P 1_IDEI /2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the significant impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD) at individual and socioeconomic levels and the numerous research studies carried out on this topic over the last decades, the treatments available in daily clinical practice remain less than satisfactory. Among the accepted etiopathogenic hypotheses, the amyloidogenic pathway theory, although intensively studied and even sometimes controversial, is still providing relevant theoretical elements for understanding the etiology of AD and for the further development of possible therapeutic tools. In this sense, this review aims to offer new insights related to beta amyloid (Aβ), an essential biomarker in AD. First the structure and function of Aβ in normal and pathological conditions are presented in detail, followed by a discussion on the dynamics of Aβ at the level of different biological compartments. There is focus on Aβ elimination modalities at central nervous system (CNS) level, and clearance via the blood-brain barrier seems to play a crucial/dominant role. Finally, different theoretical and already-applied therapeutic approaches for CNS Aβ elimination are presented, including the recent "peripheral sink therapeutic strategy" and "cerebrospinal fluid sinks therapeutic strategy". These data outline the need for a multidisciplinary approach designed to deliver a solution to stimulate Aβ clearance in more direct ways, including from the cerebrospinal fluid level.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseamyloid betaamyloidogenic pathwaycerebrospinal fluid sink therapeutic strategyperipheral sink therapeutic strategy

Identifiers

PMID34945282
PMCPMC8706225
OpenAlexW4200188910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.