ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021
Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction. Current Status and Unresolved Targets for Subsequent Research.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06327659 (Efficacy of Using 50 ml Syringe Manual Thrombectomy Catheter in Patients With Heavy Thrombus Burden Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Using 50 ml Syringe Manual Thrombectomy Catheter in Patients With Heavy Thrombus Burden Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering the clinical implication of an obesity-related gene signature as the novel biomarker for acute myocardial infarction diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimising primary care management of patients following acute coronary syndrome.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
- Acute myocardial infarction with ventricular septal rupture: Clinical characteristics, prognosis factors, and treatment strategies.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Identification of mitophagy-related genes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Hereditas · 2025Article
- Management of Myocardial Infarction and the Role of Cardiothoracic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Development of a nomogram to predict 30-day mortality in patients with post-infarction ventricular septal rupture.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Macrophage-enriched Sectm1a promotes efficient efferocytosis to attenuate ischemia/reperfusion-induced cardiac injury.JCI insight · 2024Article
- Comparison of Protective Effect of Tri-circulator and Coenzyme Q10 on Myocardial Injury and the Mechanism Study by Zebrafish Model.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical reperfusion with primary angioplasty, as the treatment of choice in acute myocardial infarction (MI), is associated not only with a high percentage of full epicardial and tissue reperfusion but also with a very good immediate and long-term clinical outcome. However, the Achilles heel of MI treatment is its ensemble of complications, such as cardiogenic shock due to severe systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction or MI mechanical complications, including perforation of the left ventricular free wall, papillary muscle rupture with acute mitral regurgitation and ventricular septal rupture. They are associated with an increased or, sometimes, with an extremely high mortality rate, determining the overall mortality in an MI patient population. In this review we summarize the mechanisms of MI complications, current therapeutic management and alternative directions for overcoming their devastating consequences. Moreover, we have sought to indicate gaps in the evidence on current treatments as the potential targets for further clinical research. From the perspective of mortality trends that are not improving, the forthcoming therapeutic management of complicated MI will require an individualized and novel approach based on their thorough pathobiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.