Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34945084›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Ejaculations and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: An Impossible Compromise? A Comprehensive Review.

Nicolas Couteau, Igor Duquesne, Panthier Frédéric, Nicolas Thiounn, Marc-Olivier Timsit, Arnaud Mejean, Ugo Pinar, François Audenet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicolas CouteauService d'Urologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France.
Igor DuquesneService d'Urologie, Hôpital Cochin, Université de Paris, 75014 Paris, France.
Panthier FrédéricService d'Urologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3055-2984
Nicolas ThiounnService d'Urologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France.
Marc-Olivier TimsitService d'Urologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France.
Arnaud MejeanService d'Urologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France.
Ugo PinarService d'Urologie, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpétriere, Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France.
François AudenetService d'Urologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5722-2075

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is commonly responsible for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men aged 50 or over. Sexual dysfunctions, such as ejaculatory disorders (EjD), go along with LUTS but are frequently overlooked in the initial evaluation. This review aimed to detail BPH-related EjD, as well as their modifications by medical, surgical, and interventional treatments.

methodsWe conducted a narrative review looking for publications between 1990 and 2020, regarding physiopathology, epidemiology, evaluation, and therapeutic management (medical, surgical, and interventional) of BPH-related EjD.

resultsSixty-five articles were included in our final analysis. Forty-six percent of men presenting with LUTS reported EjD. If the prevalence increases with age and LUTS severity, the functional impairment is not correlated with age. Several self-questionnaires evaluated the sexual function, but only four approaches are specific to EjD. Medical therapies were exposed to anejaculation, rather than retrograde ejaculation (RE) (4-30% (alpha-blockers), 4-18% (5-alpha-reductase inhibitors)). Regarding surgical therapies, trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and incision of the prostate (TUIP) are associated with 50-70% and 21-35% of RE. The RE rate is important after open simple prostatectomy but can be reduced with robotic approaches and urethral sparing techniques (19%). Anatomic endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) with or without a laser source is associated with an 11-36% RE rate, according to supramontanal preservation. Recent surgical techniques (Rezum©, Aquablation©, or Urolift©) were developed to preserve antegrade ejaculation with promising short-term results. Regardless of the surgical approach, anatomic studies suggest that the preservation of peri-montanal tissue (7.5 mm laterally; 10 mm proximally) is primordial to avoid post-operative RE. Finally, prostate artery embolization (PAE) limits the RE rate but exposes it to a 12 months 10% re-intervention rate.

conclusionEjD concerns almost half of the patients presenting BPH-related LUTS. Initial evaluation of EjD impairment is primordial before medical or surgical therapy. Peri-montanal tissue preservation represents a key point for antegrade ejaculation preservation, regardless of the surgical option.

Indexed as

anatomybenign prostatic hyperplasiaejaculationejaculation disordersendoscopic enucleation

Identifiers

PMID34945084
PMCPMC8704358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.