Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34945008›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Deep Phenotypic Characterisation of CTCs by Combination of Microfluidic Isolation (IsoFlux) and Imaging Flow Cytometry (ImageStream).

Antonio J Ruiz-Rodríguez, Maria P Molina-Vallejo, Inés Aznar-Peralta, Cristina González Puga, Inés Cañas García, Encarna González, Jose A Lorente, M Jose Serrano, M Carmen Garrido-Navas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Technologies for Viable Circulating Tumor Cell Isolation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Application of Microfluidics in Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio J Ruiz-RodríguezClinical Management Unit of Digestive Disease, San Cecilio University Hospital, 18016 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5432-2118
Maria P Molina-VallejoGENYO Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research: Pfizer, University of Granada, Andalusian Regional Government, Liquid Biopsy and Cancer Interception Group, PTS Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Inés Aznar-PeraltaGENYO Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research: Pfizer, University of Granada, Andalusian Regional Government, Liquid Biopsy and Cancer Interception Group, PTS Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Cristina González PugaClinical Management Unit of Surgery, San Cecilio University Hospital, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Inés Cañas GarcíaClinical Management Unit of Surgery, San Cecilio University Hospital, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Encarna GonzálezClinical Management Unit of Oncology, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain.
Jose A LorenteGENYO Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research: Pfizer, University of Granada, Andalusian Regional Government, Liquid Biopsy and Cancer Interception Group, PTS Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9892-7386
M Jose SerranoGENYO Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research: Pfizer, University of Granada, Andalusian Regional Government, Liquid Biopsy and Cancer Interception Group, PTS Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0298-9054
M Carmen Garrido-NavasGENYO Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research: Pfizer, University of Granada, Andalusian Regional Government, Liquid Biopsy and Cancer Interception Group, PTS Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3965-0663
Universidad de Granada · ESInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ESPfizer-University of Granada-Junta de Andalucía Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The isolation of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) mostly relies on the expression of epithelial markers such as EpCAM, and phenotypic characterisation is usually performed under fluorescence microscopy with only one or two additional markers. This limits the ability to detect different CTC subpopulations based on multiple markers. The aim of this work was to develop a novel protocol combining two platforms (IsoFlux

Indexed as

circulating tumour cellsCRCCTC heterogeneityImageStreamIsoFlux

Identifiers

PMID34945008
PMCPMC8699219
OpenAlexW4200381197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.