Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34944952›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Targeting KRAS in NSCLC: Old Failures and New Options for "Non-G12c" Patients.

Francesca Jacobs, Massimiliano Cani, Umberto Malapelle, Silvia Novello, Valerio Maria Napoli, Paolo Bironzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesca JacobsDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Turin, Italy.
Massimiliano CaniDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Turin, Italy.
Umberto MalapelleDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3211-9957
Silvia NovelloDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Turin, Italy.
Valerio Maria NapoliDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Turin, Italy.
Paolo BironzoDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2784-5076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) gene mutations are among the most common driver alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite their high frequency, valid treatment options are still lacking, mainly due to an intrinsic complexity of both the protein structure and the downstream pathway. The increasing knowledge about different mutation subtypes and co-mutations has paved the way to several promising therapeutic strategies. Despite the best results so far having been obtained in patients harbouring KRAS exon 2 p.G12C mutation, even the treatment landscape of non-p.G12C KRAS mutation positive patients is predicted to change soon. This review provides a comprehensive and critical overview of ongoing studies into NSCLC patients with KRAS mutations other than p.G12C and discusses future scenarios that will hopefully change the story of this disease.

Indexed as

drug resistanceG12CKRASnon-G12CNSCLConcogenetargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID34944952
PMCPMC8699276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.