Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34944898›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Assessing PD-L1 Expression Status Using Radiomic Features from Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI in Breast Cancer Patients: Initial Results.

Roberto Lo Gullo, Hannah Wen, Jeffrey S Reiner, Raza Hoda, Varadan Sevilimedu, Danny F Martinez, Sunitha B Thakur, Maxine S Jochelson, Peter Gibbs, Katja Pinker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Monitoring Pharmacological Treatment of Breast Cancer with MRI.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. AI Applications to Breast MRI: Today and Tomorrow.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Machine learning and new insights for breast cancer diagnosis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roberto Lo GulloBreast Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Hannah WenDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Jeffrey S ReinerBreast Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Raza HodaDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Varadan SevilimeduDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA.
Danny F MartinezBreast Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Sunitha B ThakurBreast Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8090-3696
Maxine S JochelsonBreast Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4012-2470
Peter GibbsBreast Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Katja PinkerBreast Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2722-7331

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess whether radiomics analysis coupled with machine learning (ML) based on standard-of-care dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) can predict PD-L1 expression status in patients with triple negative breast cancer, and to compare the performance of this approach with radiologist review. Patients with biopsy-proven triple negative breast cancer who underwent pre-treatment breast MRI and whose PD-L1 status was available were included. Following 3D tumor segmentation and extraction of radiomic features, radiomic features with significant differences between PD-L1+ and PD-L1- patients were determined, and a final predictive model to predict PD-L1 status was developed using a coarse decision tree and five-fold cross-validation. Separately, all lesions were qualitatively assessed by two radiologists independently according to the BI-RADS lexicon. Of 62 women (mean age 47, range 31-81), 27 had PD-L1- tumors and 35 had PD-L1+ tumors. The final radiomics model to predict PD-L1 status utilized three MRI parameters, i.e., variance (FO), run length variance (RLM), and large zone low grey level emphasis (LZLGLE), for a sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 85.1%, and diagnostic accuracy of 88.2%. There were no significant associations between qualitative assessed DCE-MRI imaging features and PD-L1 status. Thus, radiomics analysis coupled with ML based on standard-of-care DCE-MRI is a promising approach to derive prognostic and predictive information and to select patients who could benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment.

Indexed as

breast cancermagnetic resonance imagingPD-L1radiomics

Identifiers

PMID34944898
PMCPMC8699819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.