ReviewCancers2021
Augmented Reality and Image-Guided Robotic Liver Surgery.
Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Prototype to Practice: Mixed Methods Study of Human-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality for Complex Oncology Surgical Workflows.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Shifting Skills in Robot-Assisted Surgery: Case Study With Interdisciplinary Perspectives for Human Factors and Career Research.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Advanced robotic liver surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Navigating the biliary maze: a retrospective cohort study of three-dimensional navigation technology improving outcomes in congenital biliary dilatation resection.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Surgery in practice and science · 2026Review
- Augmented intelligence in "robotic" liver surgery: Integrating augmented reality and artificial intelligence for real-time navigation and margin precision.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools Across the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgical Pathway: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Technical advances and application strategies in anatomical hepatic resection based on Laennec's capsule.iLIVER · 2025Review
- Non-rigid image-volume registration for human livers in laparoscopic surgery.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Early Concepts in CT Image-Guided Robotic Vascular Surgery: The Displacement of Retroperitoneal Structures During Simulated Procedures in a Cadaveric Model.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Unveiling the real benefits of robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology: from telesurgery to image-guided surgery and artificial intelligence.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2025Article
- Total laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with Da Vinci robotic system conducted by robotic enhanced neurocomputing joint intelligence gastrointestinal surgery hub (RENJI-GISH): a preliminary clinical study and case report.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- The application of augmented reality in robotic general surgery: A mini-review.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of an augmented reality navigational guidance platform for percutaneous procedures in a cadaver model.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- [The path leading to robotic surgery].Magyar onkologia · 2024Review
- Robotic platforms in gynaecological surgery: past, present, and future.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2024Article
- Evolution of laparoscopic liver resection in the last two decades: lessons from 2000 cases at a referral Korean center.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Review
- Improving Visualization of Intramuscular Perforator Course: Augmented Reality Headsets for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Implementation and Outcome of Robotic Liver Surgery in the Netherlands: A Nationwide Analysis.Annals of surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence makes surgical resection easier and safer, and, at the same time, can improve oncological results. The robotic system fits perfectly with these more or less diffused technologies, and it seems that this benefit is mutual. In liver surgery, robotic systems help surgeons to localize tumors and improve surgical results with well-defined preoperative planning or increased intraoperative detection. Furthermore, they can balance the absence of tactile feedback and help recognize intrahepatic biliary or vascular structures during parenchymal transection. Some of these systems are well known and are already widely diffused in open and laparoscopic hepatectomies, such as indocyanine green fluorescence or ultrasound-guided resections, whereas other tools, such as Augmented Reality, are far from being standardized because of the high complexity and elevated costs. In this paper, we review all the experiences in the literature on the use of artificial intelligence systems in robotic liver resections, describing all their practical applications and their weaknesses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.