Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34944874›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Urine-Based Metabolomics and Machine Learning Reveals Metabolites Associated with Renal Cell Carcinoma Stage.

Olatomiwa O Bifarin, David A Gaul, Samyukta Sah, Rebecca S Arnold, Kenneth Ogan, Viraj A Master, David L Roberts, Sharon H Bergquist, John A Petros, Arthur S Edison and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Differences in the Fecal Metabolome of Autoimmune Pancreatitis Patients.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Abnormal changes in metabolites caused by mJournal of advanced research · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olatomiwa O BifarinDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5379-0881
David A GaulSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9308-1895
Samyukta SahSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Rebecca S ArnoldDepartment of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA.
Kenneth OganDepartment of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA.
Viraj A MasterDepartment of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA.
David L RobertsDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Sharon H BergquistDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
John A PetrosDepartment of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA.
Arthur S EdisonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5686-2350
Facundo M FernándezSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Emory University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Deep Ovarian Cancer MetabolomicsR01CA218664 · NCI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Facundo Martin Fernandez, Jaeyeon Kim · 2018 to 2026
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218664NIH HHS 1U2CES030167-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urine metabolomics profiling has potential for non-invasive RCC staging, in addition to providing metabolic insights into disease progression. In this study, we utilized liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and machine learning (ML) for the discovery of urine metabolites associated with RCC progression. Two machine learning questions were posed in the study: Binary classification into early RCC (stage I and II) and advanced RCC stages (stage III and IV), and RCC tumor size estimation through regression analysis. A total of 82 RCC patients with known tumor size and metabolomic measurements were used for the regression task, and 70 RCC patients with complete tumor-nodes-metastasis (TNM) staging information were used for the classification tasks under ten-fold cross-validation conditions. A voting ensemble regression model consisting of elastic net, ridge, and support vector regressor predicted RCC tumor size with a

Indexed as

biomarkerliquid chromatography-mass spectrometrymachine learningmetabolomicsnuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyrenal cell carcinomatumor metabolism

Identifiers

PMID34944874
PMCPMC8699523
OpenAlexW4200126986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.