Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34944748›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2021

Towards Personalized Antioxidant Use in Female Infertility: Need for More Molecular and Clinical Studies.

Jan Tesarik

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Ascorbic acid intake during pregnancy.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. The role of growth factors in human sperm parameters: A review of in vitro studies.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. 2,3,5,4'-Tetrahydroxystilbene-2-Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  13. Patient-tailored reproductive health care.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jan TesarikMARGen Clinic, Camino de Ronda 2, 18006 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4645-5804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment with antioxidants is increasingly used to slow down aging processes in different organs of the human body, including those implicated in female fertility. There is a plethora of different natural, synthetic or semi-synthetic medicines available on the market; most of them can be purchased without medical prescription. Even though the use of antioxidants, even under conditions of auto-medication, was shown to improve many functions related to female infertility related to oxidative stress, the lack of medical control and supervision can lead to an overmedication resulting in an opposite extreme, reductive stress, which can be counterproductive with regard to reproductive function and produce various adverse health effects in general. This paper reviews the current knowledge relative to the effects of different antioxidants on female reproductive function. The persisting gaps in this knowledge are also highlighted, and the need for medical supervision and personalization of antioxidant prescription is underscored.

Indexed as

agingantioxidantfemale fertilityovaryoxidative stresspersonalizationpregnancyreductive stressuterus

Identifiers

PMID34944748
PMCPMC8698668
OpenAlexW4200555749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.