Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34944488›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2021

Engineering a Pseudo-26-kDa

Neo Padi, Blessing Oluebube Akumadu, Olga Faerch, Chinyere Aloke, Vanessa Meyer, Ikechukwu Achilonu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neo PadiProtein Structure-Function and Research Unit, School of Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2749-5635
Blessing Oluebube AkumaduProtein Structure-Function and Research Unit, School of Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8713-2799
Olga FaerchProtein Structure-Function and Research Unit, School of Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.
Chinyere AlokeProtein Structure-Function and Research Unit, School of Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.
Vanessa MeyerFunctional Genomics and Immunogenetics Laboratory, School of Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1171-8195
Ikechukwu AchilonuProtein Structure-Function and Research Unit, School of Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutathione transferases (GSTs) are the main detoxification enzymes in schistosomes. These parasitic enzymes tend to be upregulated during drug treatment, with

Indexed as

AnimalsEnzyme StabilityEscherichia coliGlutathione TransferaseHelminth ProteinsModels, MolecularProtein EngineeringProtein Structure, SecondaryRecombinant ProteinsSchistosoma haematobiumSulfobromophthaleinGlutathione TransferaseHelminth ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsSulfobromophthaleinbromosulfophthaleinCDNB assayglutathione transferaseinhibitionisothermal titration calorimetrykineticspraziquantelSchistosomaspectroscopythermal shift assay

Identifiers

PMID34944488
PMCPMC8699318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.