Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34944300›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Effects of Positive Reinforcement Training and Novel Object Exposure on Salivary Cortisol Levels under Consideration of Individual Variation in Captive African Elephants (

Susan Hambrecht, Ann-Kathrin Oerke, Michael Heistermann, Johannes Hartig, Paul W Dierkes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Susan HambrechtMagdeburg Zoo, Zooallee 1, 39124 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2024-6510
Ann-Kathrin OerkeEndocrinology Laboratory, German Primate Centre, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Kellnerweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Michael HeistermannEndocrinology Laboratory, German Primate Centre, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Kellnerweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Johannes HartigEducational Measurement, Teacher and Teaching Quality, Leibniz-Institute for Research and Information in Education, Rostocker Straße 6, 60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Paul W DierkesBioscience Education and Zoo Biology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Straße 13, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6046-6406
German Primate Center · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEDIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dealing with potential stress in species that have high husbandry requirements, such as elephants, is a challenge for zoos. The objective of the present study was to determine whether positive reinforcement training (PRT) and exposure to a novel object (NOV) for enrichment induced a salivary cortisol response indicative of activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and which factors determine individual variation in this regard in captive African elephants. We repeatedly sampled the saliva of ten animals (three zoos) for the analysis of cortisol (SACort) before and up to 60 min (in 10-15 min intervals) after the onset of PRT (three repeats) or NOV (nine repeats), which lasted 10 min. There was considerable individual variation in SACort in response to PRT or NOV. Using mixed models, we were able to control these and to reveal that PRT was associated with high SACort before and relatively low SACort after PRT, while NOV induced a moderate SACort increase. The individual differences in SACort were related to age and sex (NOV), while the effects of zoo, handling method (free vs. protected contact) and reproductive and social status were variable. We conclude that positive affective states, such as anticipation or arousal, should be taken into account when interpreting the differences in the SACort responses between PRT and NOV. In addition, understanding the individuality of stress will support management decisions aimed at promoting captive elephant welfare.

Indexed as

glucocorticoid responseindividualityphysiological stresszoo elephants

Identifiers

PMID34944300
PMCPMC8698154
OpenAlexW4200500308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.