Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34944144›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Raw Chickpea (

Anna Danek-Majewska, Małgorzata Kwiecień, Anna Winiarska-Mieczan, Małgorzata Haliniarz, Agata Bielak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Using Quinoa Grain (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Dietary Replacement of Soybean Meal withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. Assessing the effects of microencapsulatedFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna Danek-MajewskaInstitute of Animal Nutrition and Bromatology, University of Life Sciences, Akademicka Street 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Małgorzata KwiecieńInstitute of Animal Nutrition and Bromatology, University of Life Sciences, Akademicka Street 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8047-8682
Anna Winiarska-MieczanInstitute of Animal Nutrition and Bromatology, University of Life Sciences, Akademicka Street 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1981-7005
Małgorzata HaliniarzDepartment of Herbology and Plant Cultivation Techniques, University of Life Sciences, Akademicka Street 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7363-9452
Agata BielakInstitute of Animal Nutrition and Bromatology, University of Life Sciences, Akademicka Street 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of substitution of 50% of soybean meal protein with 310-350 g/kg diet of raw chickpea seed protein on the chemical composition, fatty acid profile, dietary value, and antioxidant status of breast and thigh muscles, as well as the antioxidant status of blood serum, in Ross 308 male broilers. In the 42-day experiment, one-day-old male broiler chicks were assigned to two nutritional groups (

Indexed as

antioxidant statusbroiler chickenschickpeafatty acidmeat quality

Identifiers

PMID34944144
PMCPMC8698175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.