Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34944064›Full record

ReviewCells2021

Microglia and Macrophages in Neuroprotection, Neurogenesis, and Emerging Therapies for Stroke.

Susanna R Var, Anala V Shetty, Andrew W Grande, Walter C Low, Maxim C Cheeran

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susanna R VarDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5494-4248
Anala V ShettyStem Cell Institute, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1185-3183
Andrew W GrandeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6474-7969
Walter C LowDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Maxim C CheeranDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5331-4746
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Training in PharmacoNeuroImmune Substance Abuse ResearchT32DA007097 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MOLITOR, THOMAS WILLIAM · 1985 to 2021
$13.1M
Stem Cells for Treating Acute StrokeR42NS112070 · NINDS · SANERON CCEL THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI GRANDE, ANDREW W, KUZMIN-NICHOLS, NICOLE A. · 2019 to 2019
$844k
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007097NINDS NIH HHS R42 NS112070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke remains the number one cause of morbidity in the United States. Within weeks to months after an ischemic event, there is a resolution of inflammation and evidence of neurogenesis; however, years following a stroke, there is evidence of chronic inflammation in the central nervous system, possibly by the persistence of an autoimmune response to brain antigens as a result of ischemia. The mechanisms underlying the involvement of macrophage and microglial activation after stroke are widely acknowledged as having a role in ischemic stroke pathology; thus, modulating inflammation and neurological recovery is a hopeful strategy for treating the long-term outcomes after ischemic injury. Current treatments fail to provide neuroprotective or neurorestorative benefits after stroke; therefore, to ameliorate brain injury-induced deficits, therapies must alter both the initial response to injury and the subsequent inflammatory process. This review will address differences in macrophage and microglia nomenclature and summarize recent work in elucidating the mechanisms of macrophage and microglial participation in antigen presentation, neuroprotection, angiogenesis, neurogenesis, synaptic remodeling, and immune modulating strategies for treating the long-term outcomes after ischemic injury.

Indexed as

AutoimmunityBrain InjuriesBrain IschemiaCentral Nervous SystemHumansInflammationMacrophagesMicrogliaNeurogenesisNeuroprotective AgentsStrokeNeuroprotective Agentsinflammationmacrophagemicroglianeurogenesisneuroprotectionstroketherapiestransplantation

Identifiers

PMID34944064
PMCPMC8700390
OpenAlexW4200608597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.