Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34943816›Full record

ReviewCells2021

Translational Stroke Research Review: Using the Mouse to Model Human Futile Recanalization and Reperfusion Injury in Ischemic Brain Tissue.

Emilia Conti, Benedetta Piccardi, Alessandro Sodero, Laura Tudisco, Ivano Lombardo, Enrico Fainardi, Patrizia Nencini, Cristina Sarti, Anna Letizia Allegra Mascaro, Marzia Baldereschi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emilia ContiNeuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Via G. Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2163-0258
Benedetta PiccardiNeurofarba Department, University of Florence, Via G. Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Alessandro SoderoNeurofarba Department, University of Florence, Via G. Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4356-6912
Laura TudiscoNeurofarba Department, University of Florence, Via G. Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Ivano LombardoDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 50, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-6109
Enrico FainardiDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 50, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Patrizia NenciniStroke Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Cristina SartiNeurofarba Department, University of Florence, Via G. Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Anna Letizia Allegra MascaroNeuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Via G. Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8489-0076
Marzia BaldereschiNeuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7703-4987
University of Florence · ITNeuroscience Institute · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · IT

Funding

Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SIME 2018/1179 id#24055Regione Toscana-Bando Ricerca Salute 2018 20RSVP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The approach to reperfusion therapies in stroke patients is rapidly evolving, but there is still no explanation why a substantial proportion of patients have a poor clinical prognosis despite successful flow restoration. This issue of futile recanalization is explained here by three clinical cases, which, despite complete recanalization, have very different outcomes. Preclinical research is particularly suited to characterize the highly dynamic changes in acute ischemic stroke and identify potential treatment targets useful for clinical translation. This review surveys the efforts taken so far to achieve mouse models capable of investigating the neurovascular underpinnings of futile recanalization. We highlight the translational potential of targeting tissue reperfusion in fully recanalized mouse models and of investigating the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms from subcellular to tissue scale. We suggest that stroke preclinical research should increasingly drive forward a continuous and circular dialogue with clinical research. When the preclinical and the clinical stroke research are consistent, translational success will follow.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsBrain IschemiaDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceOptical ImagingReperfusion InjuryStrokebrainfutile recanalizationischemic strokemechanical thrombectomyreperfusiontranslational stroke research

Identifiers

PMID34943816
PMCPMC8699609
OpenAlexW3214983882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.