Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34943743›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Community Antibiotic Prescribing and Stewardship: A Qualitative Interview Study with General Practitioners in England.

Aleksandra J Borek, Katherine Maitland, Monsey McLeod, Anne Campbell, Benedict Hayhoe, Christopher C Butler, Liz Morrell, Laurence S J Roope, Alison Holmes, Ann Sarah Walker and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Primary care practitioners' experiences managing urinary tract infections: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aleksandra J BorekNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6029-5291
Katherine MaitlandNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
Monsey McLeodNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5571-2417
Anne CampbellNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Benedict HayhoeDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2645-6191
Christopher C ButlerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0102-3453
Liz MorrellHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6382-1795
Laurence S J RoopeHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9098-9331
Alison HolmesNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5554-5743
Ann Sarah WalkerNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Sarah Tonkin-CrineNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4470-1151
On Behalf Of The Step-Up Study Team

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/P008232/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on the delivery of primary care services. We aimed to identify general practitioners' (GPs') perceptions and experiences of how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced antibiotic prescribing and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in general practice in England. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 GPs at two time-points: autumn 2020 (14 interviews) and spring 2021 (10 interviews). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically, taking a longitudinal approach. Participants reported a lower threshold for antibiotic prescribing (and fewer consultations) for respiratory infections and COVID-19 symptoms early in the pandemic, then returning to more usual (pre-pandemic) prescribing. They perceived the pandemic as having had less impact on antibiotic prescribing for urinary and skin infections. Participants perceived the changing ways of working and consulting (e.g., proportions of remote and in-person consultations) in addition to changing patient presentations and GP workloads as influencing the fluctuations in antibiotic prescribing. This was compounded by decreased engagement with, and priority of, AMS due to COVID-19-related urgent priorities. Re-engagement with AMS is needed, e.g., through reviving antibiotic prescribing feedback and targets/incentives. The pandemic disrupted, and required adaptations in, the usual ways of working and AMS. It is now important to identify opportunities, e.g., for re-organising ways of managing infections and AMS in the future.

Indexed as

antibioticsantimicrobial stewardshipCOVID-19general practicequalitative

Identifiers

PMID34943743
PMCPMC8698307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.