Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34943666›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Dose Optimization of Colistin: A Systematic Review.

Abdul Haseeb, Hani Saleh Faidah, Saleh Alghamdi, Amal F Alotaibi, Mahmoud Essam Elrggal, Ahmad Jamal Mahrous, Safa S Almarzoky Abuhussain, Najla A Obaid, Manal Algethamy, Abdullmoin AlQarni and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim) Dose Optimization inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Comorbidities and mortality in colistin-resistant gram-negative infections among hospitalized patients in Qassim, Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Abdul HaseebDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2455-5054
Hani Saleh FaidahDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.
Saleh AlghamdiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Clinical Pharmacy, Al Baha University, Al Baha 65779, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7975-933X
Amal F AlotaibiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud Essam ElrggalDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad Jamal MahrousDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7140-741X
Safa S Almarzoky AbuhussainDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2513-5043
Najla A ObaidDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7094-0813
Manal AlgethamyAlnoor Specialist Hospital, Department of Infection Prevention & Control Program, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullmoin AlQarniAlnoor Specialist Hospital, Infectious Diseases Department, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.
Asim A KhogeerPlan and Research Department, General Directorate of Health Affairs of Makkah Regiona, Ministry of Health, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6508-7747
Zikria SaleemDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3202-6347
Aziz SheikhUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK.
Umm al-Qura University · SASaad Specialist Hospital · SAAl Baha University · SAMaternity and Children's Hospital · SAUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Lahore · PK

Funding

Deanship of Scientific research at Umm Al-Qura University 19-MED-1-01-0029.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colistin is considered a last treatment option for multi-drug and extensively resistant Gram-negative infections. We aimed to assess the available data on the dosing strategy of colistin. A systematic review was performed to identify all published studies on the dose optimization of colistin. Grey literature and electronic databases were searched. Data were collected in a specified form and the quality of the included articles was then assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies, the Cochrane bias tool for randomized clinical trials (RCT), and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical checklist for case reports. A total of 19 studies were included, of which 16 were cohort studies, one was a RCT, and two were case reports. A total of 18 studies proposed a dosing regimen for adults, while only one study proposed a dosing schedule for pediatric populations. As per the available evidence, a loading dose of 9 million international units (MIU) of colistin followed by a maintenance dose of 4.5 MIU every 12 h was considered the most appropriate dosing strategy to optimize the safety and efficacy of treatment and improve clinical outcomes. This review supports the administration of a loading dose followed by a maintenance dose of colistin in severe and life-threatening multi-drug Gram-negative bacterial infections.

Indexed as

colistindose optimizationGram-negative infectionsnephrotoxicity

Identifiers

PMID34943666
PMCPMC8698549
OpenAlexW3217557260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.