Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34943602›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

The Summarized Assessment of Endothelin A Receptor Expression in Renal Transplant Compartments Associated with Antibody-Mediated Rejection.

Mirosław Banasik, Magdalena Kuriata-Kordek, Piotr Donizy, Katarzyna Nowańska, Krzysztof Wiśnicki, Krzysztof Letachowicz, Sławomir Zmonarski, Dorota Kamińska, Oktawia Mazanowska, Tomasz Dawiskiba and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mirosław BanasikDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0588-1551
Magdalena Kuriata-KordekDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Piotr DonizyDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Katarzyna NowańskaDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Krzysztof WiśnickiDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1073-5759
Krzysztof LetachowiczDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2747-8851
Sławomir ZmonarskiDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Dorota KamińskaDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2400-9328
Oktawia MazanowskaDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7669-7543
Tomasz DawiskibaDepartment of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Dariusz JanczakDepartment of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Agnieszka HałońDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Marta KepinskaDepartment of Biomedical and Environmental Analyses, Faculty of Pharmacy, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 211, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0935-5663
Bartosz UchmanowiczDepartment of Nervous System Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-618 Wroclaw, Poland.
Justyna ZachciałDepartment of Clinical Nursing, Division of Nursing in Internal Medicine Procedures, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Andrzej TukiendorfDepartment of Social Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Magdalena KrajewskaDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Wroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

Wrocław Medical University STM.C160.20.155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of anti-endothelin A receptor antibodies may be useful in diagnosis of transplant damage. We noticed that the presence of the endothelin A receptor (ETA receptor) in biopsy compartments is yet to be defined. We decided therefore to analysed the presence and relevance of the ETA receptor in biopsy to define the cause. Our study aims to evaluate the expression of ETA receptors in renal recipients after a biopsy due to the worsening of transplant function.

methodsThe expression of ETA receptors was analyzed in renal transplant biopsies using the immunohistochemical method. The evaluation of ETA receptors was performed on paraffin sections. ETA receptor expression was analyzed in four compartments of renal transplant biopsies: glomeruli; vessels; tubular epithelium; and interstitium. The assessment was presented using a three-step scale (0: lack of expression; 1: mild to moderate immunoreactivity; 2: high expression). The results of each compartment from a single biopsy were summarized and assessed in the context of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

resultsWe analyzed 156 patients who had a renal allograft biopsy after renal transplantation. For each patient, we created a summarized ETA receptor expression score. The summarized ETA receptor expression score analysis showed statistically significant differences in patients with and without AMR. In addition, we noticed that patients with AMR had a significantly higher mean summarized expression of ETA receptor score of 3.28 ± 1.56 compared to patients who had a biopsy for other reasons with a mean summarized ETA receptor expression score of 1.47 ± 1.35 (

conclusionsThe expression of endothelin A receptors in renal transplant compartments may be associated with antibody-mediated rejection. The positive ETA receptor staining might be a vital feature in the diagnosis of damage in AMR. The summarized ETA receptor expression score seems to be an exciting diagnostic tool in transplant injury assessment.

Indexed as

allograft injuryantibody-mediated rejectionendothelin A receptorsnon-HLA antibodies

Identifiers

PMID34943602
PMCPMC8699842
OpenAlexW4200461532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.