Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34943559›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Concordance between Pressure Platform and Pedigraph.

Cristina Gonzalez-Martin, Uxia Fernandez-Lopez, Abian Mosquera-Fernandez, Vanesa Balboa-Barreiro, Maria Teresa Garcia-Rodriguez, Rocio Seijo-Bestilleiro, Raquel Veiga-Seijo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cristina Gonzalez-MartinResearch Group in Nursing and Health Care, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, Universidade da Coruña (UDC), 15071 A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4140-6264
Uxia Fernandez-LopezDepartament of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Campus of Esteiro, University of A Coruña, 15471 Ferrol, Spain.
Abian Mosquera-FernandezDepartament of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Campus of Esteiro, University of A Coruña, 15471 Ferrol, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8049-9758
Vanesa Balboa-BarreiroResearch Group in Nursing and Health Care, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, Universidade da Coruña (UDC), 15071 A Coruña, Spain.
Maria Teresa Garcia-RodriguezResearch Group in Nursing and Health Care, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, Universidade da Coruña (UDC), 15071 A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6887-8109
Rocio Seijo-BestilleiroResearch Group in Nursing and Health Care, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, Universidade da Coruña (UDC), 15071 A Coruña, Spain.
Raquel Veiga-SeijoResearch Group in Nursing and Health Care, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, Universidade da Coruña (UDC), 15071 A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3175-8351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDetermine the concordance between two methods of obtaining the plantar footprint (pedigraph and pressure platform).

methodsA descriptive, cross-sectional, observational study of prevalence was carried out in the social center of Cariño (Coruña), Spain (

resultsThe mean age of the sample was 37.42 ± 15.05 years, with a predominance of the female gender (61.54%). Positive linear correlation between pedigraph and platform was observed in both feet in the Chippaux and Staheli indices (correlation coefficient > 0.3,

conclusionsA positive linear correlation between pedigraph and platform was observed in both feet in the Chippaux and Staheli indices. Significant differences were observed between pedigraph and platform in relation to the width and length of the foot. It is probably due to the fact that the pressure platform provides more exhaustive, detailed and accurate information of the foot.

Indexed as

footpedigraphpressure platform

Identifiers

PMID34943559
PMCPMC8700632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.