Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34943541›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Advanced Bronchoscopic Technologies for Biopsy of the Pulmonary Nodule: A 2021 Review.

Micah Z Levine, Sam Goodman, Robert J Lentz, Fabien Maldonado, Otis B Rickman, James Katsis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Two-phase radial endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscopy registration.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Micah Z LevineRush University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Sam GoodmanRush University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Robert J LentzVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Fabien MaldonadoVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Otis B RickmanVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
James KatsisRush University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Rush University Medical Center · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of interventional pulmonology (IP) has grown from a fringe subspecialty utilized in only a few centers worldwide to a standard component in advanced medical centers. IP is increasingly recognized for its value in patient care and its ability to deliver minimally invasive and cost-effective diagnostics and treatments. This article will provide an in-depth review of advanced bronchoscopic technologies used by IP physicians focusing on pulmonary nodules. While most pulmonary nodules are benign, malignant nodules represent the earliest detectable manifestation of lung cancer. Lung cancer is the second most common and the deadliest cancer worldwide. Differentiating benign from malignant nodules is clinically challenging as these entities are often indistinguishable radiographically. Tissue biopsy is often required to discriminate benign from malignant nodule etiologies. A safe and accurate means of definitively differentiating benign from malignant nodules would be highly valuable for patients, and the medical system at large. This would translate into a greater number of early-stage cancer detections while reducing the burden of surgical resections for benign disease. There is little high-grade evidence to guide clinicians on optimal lung nodule tissue sampling modalities. The number of novel technologies available for this purpose has rapidly expanded over the last decade, making it difficult for clinicians to assess their efficacy. Unfortunately, there is a wide variety of methods used to determine the accuracy of these technologies, making comparisons across studies impossible. This paper will provide an in-depth review of available data regarding advanced bronchoscopic technologies.

Indexed as

bronchoscopylung cancerlung nodulenavigational bronchoscopyrobotic bronchoscopy

Identifiers

PMID34943541
PMCPMC8700532
OpenAlexW4200486461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.