ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Compensating Positron Range Effects of Ga-68 in Preclinical PET Imaging by Using Convolutional Neural Network: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A tissue-informed deep learning-based method for positron range correction in preclinical [Formula: see text]Ga PET imaging.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Positron Range Corrections and Denoising Techniques for Gallium-68 PET Imaging: A Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Editorial on Special Issue "Quantitative PET and SPECT".Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of positron range correction based on three different convolutional neural network (CNN) models in preclinical PET imaging of Ga-68. The first model (CNN1) was originally designed for super-resolution recovery, while the second model (CNN2) and the third model (CNN3) were originally designed for pseudo CT synthesis from MRI. A preclinical PET scanner and 30 phantom configurations were modeled in Monte Carlo simulations, where each phantom configuration was simulated twice, once for Ga-68 (CNN input images) and once for back-to-back 511-keV gamma rays (CNN output images) with a 20 min emission scan duration. The Euclidean distance was used as the loss function to minimize the difference between CNN input and output images. According to our results, CNN3 outperformed CNN1 and CNN2 qualitatively and quantitatively. With regard to qualitative observation, it was found that boundaries in Ga-68 images became sharper after correction. As for quantitative analysis, the recovery coefficient (RC) and spill-over ratio (SOR) were increased after correction, while no substantial increase in coefficient of variation of RC (CV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.