Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34943418›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Deep Learning Applications in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Has the Future Become Present?

Sebastian Gassenmaier, Thomas Küstner, Dominik Nickel, Judith Herrmann, Rüdiger Hoffmann, Haidara Almansour, Saif Afat, Konstantin Nikolaou, Ahmed E Othman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Cross-Site Generalization of CNN-BasedNMR in biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sebastian GassenmaierDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3701-2227
Thomas KüstnerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Image and Data Analysis (MIDAS.lab), Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0353-4898
Dominik NickelMR Applications Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Allee am Roethelheimpark 2, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0360-7233
Judith HerrmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1535-8980
Rüdiger HoffmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Haidara AlmansourDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Saif AfatDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6861-6245
Konstantin NikolaouDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Ahmed E OthmanDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning technologies and applications demonstrate one of the most important upcoming developments in radiology. The impact and influence of these technologies on image acquisition and reporting might change daily clinical practice. The aim of this review was to present current deep learning technologies, with a focus on magnetic resonance image reconstruction. The first part of this manuscript concentrates on the basic technical principles that are necessary for deep learning image reconstruction. The second part highlights the translation of these techniques into clinical practice. The third part outlines the different aspects of image reconstruction techniques, and presents a review of the current literature regarding image reconstruction and image post-processing in MRI. The promising results of the most recent studies indicate that deep learning will be a major player in radiology in the upcoming years. Apart from decision and diagnosis support, the major advantages of deep learning magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction techniques are related to acquisition time reduction and the improvement of image quality. The implementation of these techniques may be the solution for the alleviation of limited scanner availability via workflow acceleration. It can be assumed that this disruptive technology will change daily routines and workflows permanently.

Indexed as

deep learningDLGREMRIMSKprostate MRITSE

Identifiers

PMID34943418
PMCPMC8700442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.