Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34943410›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Advances in Lymphoma Molecular Diagnostics.

Igor Age Kos, Lorenz Thurner, Joerg Thomas Bittenbring, Konstantinos Christofyllakis, Dominic Kaddu-Mulindwa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Igor Age KosDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology, Rheumatology, Medical School, University of Saarland, 66424 Homburg, Germany.
Lorenz ThurnerDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology, Rheumatology, Medical School, University of Saarland, 66424 Homburg, Germany.
Joerg Thomas BittenbringDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology, Rheumatology, Medical School, University of Saarland, 66424 Homburg, Germany.
Konstantinos ChristofyllakisDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology, Rheumatology, Medical School, University of Saarland, 66424 Homburg, Germany.
Dominic Kaddu-MulindwaDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology, Rheumatology, Medical School, University of Saarland, 66424 Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8832-252X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymphomas encompass a diverse group of malignant lymphoid neoplasms. Over recent years much scientific effort has been undertaken to identify and understand molecular changes in lymphomas, resulting in a wide range of genetic alterations that have been reported across all types of lymphomas. As many of these changes are now incorporated into the World Health Organization's defined criteria for the diagnostic evaluation of patients with lymphoid neoplasms, their accurate identification is crucial. Even if many alterations are not routinely evaluated in daily clinical practice, they may still have implications in risk stratification, treatment, prognosis or disease monitoring. Moreover, some alterations can be used for targeted treatment. Therefore, these advances in lymphoma molecular diagnostics in some cases have led to changes in treatment algorithms. Here, we give an overview of and discuss advances in molecular techniques in current clinical practice, as well as highlight some of them in a clinical context.

Indexed as

lymphoma diagnosticsmolecular diagnosticsnon-Hodgkin lymphomasequencing

Identifiers

PMID34943410
PMCPMC8699850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.